Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Minnesota Supreme Court

Court

Minnesota Supreme Court

Minnesota

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-12-06
Status Closed
Type Standard Civil Certiorari
Docket 33 entries

Docket Entries

  1. etition - Certiorari
  2. pinion - Nonprecedential
  3. otice - Opinion Release Imminent
  4. vent - Oral - Panel
  5. vent - Panel Assignment Update
  6. rief - Reply E-Filed-Appellant
  7. otice - Oral Argument Date Scheduled
  8. vent - Oral Panel - scheduled for 06/12/2025, 10:40 a.m., #200
  9. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Tamara O'Neill Moreland and Inga K. Kingland obo Respondent (Arbor Creek Holdings, LLC)
  10. rief - Respondent E-Filed (Arbor Creek Holdings, LLC)
  11. rief - Respondent E-Filed (Wright County Planning Commission)
  12. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Attorney Ervin for Wright County Planning Commission
  13. vent - Electronic Record Submitted/Received - MACS
  14. otice - Request Trial Court/Agency File
  15. rief - Appellant E-Filed
  16. vent - Itemized List of Record Received
  17. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - Sandra Fellows
  18. ejected - Delivery Certificate - Incomplete
  19. ranscript - Initial Certificate - Sandra Fellows
  20. ffidavit - Service of writ of cert
  21. rder - Remedy Deficiencies-Relator to File Proof of Service of Issued Writ Upon Wright County Planning Commission by 1/2/25.
  22. otice - Attorney Appearance - Tamara O'Neil Moreland obo Respondent (Arbor Creek Holdings, LLC)
  23. rder - Grant-Atty. Colette Brashears Admitted Pro Hoc Vice o/b/o Relator
  24. otion - Pro Hac Vice Atty Brashears o/b/o Relator
  25. otice - Attorney Appearance Atty Ervin o/b/o Respondent
  26. ffidavit - Service - Petition, Statement of the Case, Unsigned Writ
  27. ffidavit - Service Rejected - Document Caption Inconsistent with Documents Listed in Affidavit
  28. ffidavit - Service of writ of cert Rejected as Duplicative
  29. ffidavit - Service of writ of cert
  30. rder - Remedy Deficiencies - Relator to file proof of service of petition and statement of case on respondent Arbor Creek Holdings LLC and proof of service of issued writ on respondents by 12/19/24.
  31. otice - Case Filing
  32. rit - Certiorari
  33. tatement - Case - Relator

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more