Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-12-05
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 22 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Franco Mora, Mark
Photo of Hon. Pebet Noelle

Judge

Hon. Pebet Noelle

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Appeared in Person
  2. Proof of Service Comment Sub Served: "Jane Doe" / Date: / Dec of Diligence attached
  3. Answer Filed Family Support
  4. Notice of Motion Comment NOM Jud,CS,HC,Join/Hrg Date: @8am Dept:302
  5. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Mark Franco Mora, Karla Edith Rosales Ramirez. Mailed on
  6. Motion - Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion - Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  7. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  8. Motion for Health Care (Family Support) Original Type Motion for Health Care (Family Support) Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  9. Motion - Joinder Original Type Motion - Joinder Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  10. Appeared in Person
  11. Income and Expense Declaration
  12. Income and Expense Declaration
  13. Family Code 4065 Waiver Comment signed by: all parites
  14. Party Joined
  15. Minute Order Corrected/Amended Comment 2nd Corrected- corrected ongoing CS date and joinder name.
  16. Income and Expense Declaration
  17. Modification OSC/Motion - Re: Child Support Comment Hrg Date: @8am Dept:302
  18. Proof of Service Comment Party Served: Chelsea Chavez DCSS; Personal Service;
  19. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Party Served:Karla Edith Ramirez Rosales Date Mailed:
  20. Responsive Declaration Comment to RFO / HRG: @ 8AM Dept 302
  21. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Party Served:Mark Franco Mora and Karla Edith Rosales Ramirez Date Mailed:
  22. Motion Modify Child Support Original Type Motion Modify Child Support Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Respondent: Franco Mora, Mark Petitioner: County of Fresno

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more