Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Court Order: ORDER ADVISING PARTIES OF A PROBABLE CONTINUANCE
- Complaint Re Real Estate Matter Receipt: 2218309 Date: 09/11/2024
- Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
- Attorney Information Attorney Levesque, Joseph N representing Plaintiff CIty of Houston, Alaska as of 09/11/2024
- Corrected Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
- Return of Service - Summons Served On: 09/14/2024 Joseph Stanistreet (Defendant);
- Answer Joseph Stanistreet (Defendant);
- Notice of Hearing
- Supplemental Filing (PPK only) Joseph N Levesque (Attorney) on behalf of CIty of Houston, Alaska (Plaintiff)
- Proposed Order Granting Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief (PPK only)
- Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: (CURED 12/13/24) TO: JOSEPH N LEVESQUE RE: Supplemental Filing & Proposed Order Granting Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief ACTION NEEDED TO CORRECT FILING You have recently submitted documents related to the above case. These documents are either incomplete or do not follow correct procedures. Please do the following: You did not serve the other side. You must give the other side in the case copies of every document you file in court. This is called service. Fill out the certificate of service section at the end of the form or file a separate certificate of service form that includes: the documents served, who you served, when you did service, and how you provided copies to the other side in the case. You can use Certificate of Service (form TF-700), available at ak-courts.info/tf700. Serve by first-class mail or hand-delivery unless otherwise ordered by the court. Or, if the other side agreed to service by fax or email by checking that option in any filing (or by filing a separate notice of consent), then you can serve by that method instead. Civil Rules 5(f) and 5.1(c)(3). Civil Deficiency Memo (11/23) Sent on: 11/27/2024 11:10:02.41
- Routine Pretrial Order Issued
- Certificate of Service (PPK only) Joseph N Levesque (Attorney) on behalf of CIty of Houston, Alaska (Plaintiff)
- Entry of Appearance Jackson N Morawski (Attorney) on behalf of CIty of Houston, Alaska (Plaintiff)
- Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Mootness) (PPK only) Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Stanistreet, Joseph Case Motion #1
- Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (PPK only) Jackson N Morawski (Attorney) on behalf of CIty of Houston, Alaska (Plaintiff) Case Motion #1: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Mootness) (PPK only)
- Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: (CURED 3/20/25) TO: JACKSON N MORAWSKI RE: Opposition to Motion to Dismiss ACTION NEEDED TO CORRECT FILING You have recently submitted documents related to the above case. These documents are either incomplete or do not follow correct procedures. Please do the following: You did not file a proposed order with your request, motion, or opposition. File a proposed order, provide the other side in the case with a copy, and file a certificate of service showing when and how you gave a copy to the other side. You can use Certificate of Service (form TF-700), available at ak-courts.info/tf700. Civil Rule 77. Civil Deficiency Memo (11/23) Sent on: 03/20/2025 13:25:19.18
- Proposed Order (Linked to Motion) Case Motion #1: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Mootness) (PPK only)
- Defendant's Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Mootness) (PPK only) Joseph Stanistreet (Defendant); Case Motion #1: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Mootness) (PPK only)
- Order Denying Motion / Stanistreet, Joseph Case Motion #1 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Mootness) (PPK only)
- Log Notes: Non-Jury Trial
- Court Order: Order Dismissing Case
- Motion to Set Aside Judgment (Rule 60(b)) Attorney: Morawski, Jackson N (2310113) Filing Party: CIty of Houston, Alaska Case Motion #2
- PROOF OF SERVICE
- Case Dismissed. Case Closed.
- Order Granting Motion / CIty of Houston, Alaska Case Motion #2 Motion to Set Aside Judgment (Rule 60(b))
- Log Notes: Pretrial Conference
- City of Houston's Motion for Summary Judgment Attorney: Morawski, Jackson N (2310113) Filing Party: CIty of Houston, Alaska Case Motion #3
- City of Houston's Motion for Expedited Consideration of Motion for Summary Judgment Attorney: Morawski, Jackson N (2310113) Filing Party: CIty of Houston, Alaska Case Motion #4
- PROOF OF SERVICE
- Order Denying Motion / CIty of Houston, Alaska Case Motion #4 / City of Houston's Motion for Expedited Consideration of Motion for Summary Judgment
- City of Houston's Witness List
- PROOF OF SERVICE
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In