Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-11-15
Status Open
Type Employment Agreements
Docket 73 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Slitt, Brian
Defendant Inmarket Corp

Docket Entries

  1. Attorney appearance On this date Robert R Berluti, Esq. added for Plaintiff Brian Slitt
  2. Attorney appearance On this date Michael Allen Bednarz, Esq. added for Plaintiff Brian Slitt
  3. Original civil complaint filed.
  4. Civil Action Cover Sheet filed.
  5. Docket Note: 11/15/21 One summon in hand
  6. General correspondence regarding NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE INTO BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION "BLS1" This matter has been accepted into the Suffolk Business Litigation Session. It has been assigned to BLS1. Dated: November 15, 2021 Notice sent 11/19/21 (See P#3 for complete notice)
  7. Amended: amended complaint filed by Brian Slitt
  8. Answer with a claim for jury trial Applies To: Inmarket Corp (Defendant)
  9. Attorney appearance On this date Kenneth B Walton, Esq. added for Defendant Inmarket Corp
  10. Attorney appearance On this date Lauren Farley, Esq. added for Defendant Inmarket Corp
  11. Plaintiff, Defendant Brian Slitt, Inmarket Corp's Joint Request for Rule 16 Conference
  12. Endorsement on Request for Rule 16 Conference (#6.0): ALLOWED Allowed. (8/8/22) (Notice sent 8/22/22)
  13. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear - BLS Sent On: 08/22/2022 10:03:16
  14. Proposed Filings/Orders
  15. Event Result:: BLS Rule 16 Litigation Control Conference scheduled on: 09/01/2022 02:00 PM Has been: Held as Scheduled Hon. Helene Kazanjian, Presiding Staff: Gloria Brooks, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  16. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 09/01/2022 14:15:08
  17. Endorsement on Submission of Joint Rule 16 Agenda and Tracking Order (#7.0): ALLOWED The court adopts the proposed tracking order. The court also schedules the case for a status conference on May 9, 2023 at 2:00pm (dated 9/1/22) notice sent 9/8/22
  18. Plaintiff, Defendant Brian Slitt, Inmarket Corp's Joint Motion to Extend the Tracking Order Deadlines
  19. Endorsement on Motion to extend the Tracking order deadlines (#8.0): ALLOWED After hearing ALLOWED insofar as the time to complete fact discovery is extended to 7/28/2023. The court will take up other portions of this motion, and set other dates, at the hearing scheduled for 5/9/2023. (Dated 4/10/2023) Notice sent 4/12/2023
  20. Event Result:: Conference to Review Status scheduled on: 05/09/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Held via Video/Teleconference Hon. Peter B Krupp, Presiding Staff: Gloria Brooks, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  21. Notice Of Filing Pursuant To Superior Court Rule 9A
  22. Plaintiff Brian Slitt's Motion to Compel Production Of Documents (Request for Hearing & Memorandum Of Law Incorporated)
  23. Opposition to Motion To Compel filed by Inmarket Corp
  24. Reply/Sur-reply In Support Of His Motion To Compel Documents
  25. Matter taken under advisement: Motion Hearing to Compel scheduled on: 05/25/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Held - Under advisement Hon. Peter B Krupp, Presiding Staff: Gloria Brooks, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  26. Event Result:: Conference to Review Status scheduled on: 06/16/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Canceled For the following reason: By Court prior to date Hon. Peter B Krupp, Presiding Staff: Gloria Brooks, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  27. Endorsement on Motion to compel Production of Documents (Request for Hearing and Memorandum of Law Incorporated) (#9.0): Other action taken After hearing, ALLOWED in part by agreement, and otherwise DENIED based on the agreement of the parties. See Order of same date. (Dated 5/26/2023) Notice sent 5/31/2023
  28. ORDER: Order See page #12 (Dated 5/26/2023) Notice sent 5/31/2023
  29. Party(s) file Agreement Confidentiality Agreement and Stipulated Protective Order Applies To: Slitt, Brian (Plaintiff); Inmarket Corp (Defendant)
  30. Plaintiff, Defendant Brian Slitt, Inmarket Corp's Joint Motion to extend the Tracking Order deadlines
  31. Endorsement on Motion to extend the Tracking Order deadlines (#14.0): ALLOWED Discovery shall be completed by 9/29/2023. Rule 56 Motions to be served by 10-10-2023 and filed by 11/10/2023. The parties should not expect further Extensions. (Dated 8/21/2023) Notice sent 8/28/23
  32. Plaintiff Brian Slitt's Motion to Extend Discovery and Compel the Deposition of Defendant's Chief Financial Officer
  33. Opposition to Motion to Extend Discovery and Compel the Deposition of Defendant's Chief Financial Officer filed by Inmarket Corp
  34. Plaintiff Brian Slitt's Notice of Filing
  35. Plaintiff Brian Slitt's Submission of List of Documents
  36. Conference Memorandum Joint Pre-Trial Memorandum
  37. Event Result:: Final Pre-Trial Conference scheduled on: 11/08/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Held as Scheduled Hon. Helene Kazanjian, Presiding Staff: Gloria Brooks, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  38. Endorsement on Motion to Extend Discovery and Compel the Deposition of Defendant's Chief Financial Officer (#15.0): ALLOWED After a hearing, discovery is extended to 12/8/23 for the sole purpose of defendant taking the deposition of CFO Deniece Kennedy. Defendant has until 1/2/24 to serve a revised Rule 56 motion. Plaintiff has until 1/16/23 to serve a revised opposition. Defendants' Rule 56 motion must be filed by 1/19/24. Argument in the Rule 56 motion is scheduled for 2/8/24 at 2:00 PM. (Dated: 11/8/23) Notice sent 11/15/23
  39. Defendant Inmarket Corp's Motion for Summary Judgment
  40. Inmarket Corp's Memorandum in support of of Motion for Summary Judgment
  41. Opposition to Defendant Inmarket Media, LLC' Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Brian Slitt
  42. Reply/Sur-reply Inmarket Media, LLC's Reply to Brian Slitt's Opposition to it's Motion for Summary Judgment
  43. Plaintiff, Defendant Brian Slitt, Inmarket Corp's Joint Statement of Material Facts
  44. Exhibits/Appendix Joint Index of Exhibits
  45. Exhibits/Appendix Exhibits 1- 16
  46. Affidavit of Compliance with Rule 9A
  47. Affidavit of Compliance with Rule 9C
  48. Defendant Inmarket Corp's Notice of Filing per Rule 9A
  49. Defendant Inmarket Corp's Submission of List of Documents Per Rule 9A
  50. Event Result:: Conference to Review Status scheduled on: 01/19/2024 05:30 AM Has been: Held as Scheduled Hon. Peter B Krupp, Presiding Staff: Gloria Brooks, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  51. Defendant Inmarket Corp's Motion for Summary Judgment
  52. Inmarket Corp's Memorandum in support of Motion for Summary Judgment
  53. Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Brian Slitt
  54. Reply/Sur-reply To Brian Slitt's Opposition Motion for Summary Judgment And Memorandum Of Law
  55. Plaintiff, Defendant Brian Slitt, Inmarket Corp's Joint Statement of Material Facts
  56. Brian Slitt, Inmarket Corp's Joint Appendix of Exhibits
  57. Affidavit Of Compliance With Rule 9C
  58. Affidavit Of Compliance With Rule 9A
  59. Notice Of Filing Per Rule 9A
  60. Event Result:: Rule 56 Hearing scheduled on: 02/08/2024 02:00 PM Has been: Not Held For the following reason: Joint request of parties Hon. Peter B Krupp, Presiding Staff: Gloria Brooks, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  61. Endorsement on Motion for Summary Judgment (#23.0): DENIED After hearing, DENIED. See Memorandum and Order of same date. (Dated: 2/12/24) Notice Sent 2/16/24
  62. MEMORANDUM & ORDER: On Motion for Summary Judgement ORDER: InMarket Media, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #18) is DENIED. (Dated: 2/12/24) Judge: Krupp, Hon. Peter B Notice Sent 2/16/24
  63. ORDER: Scheduling Order This case came before me for a hearing on defendant's motion for summary judgement, which I have decided separately. At the hearing on the summary judgment motion. the parties professed a desire to try to settle the case through mediation. I will give the parties a period of time to do that. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: The court will conduct a Final Pretrial Conference on May 23, 2024, at 2pm in the meantime, the parties will be free to pursue mediation as they see fit. (Dated: 2/12/24) Notice Sent 2/16/24
  64. Plaintiff Brian Slitt's Motion to Amend Complaint Based on Newly Discovered Evidence
  65. Opposition to Motion to Amend Complaint Based on Newly Discovered Evidence filed by Inmarket Corp
  66. Plaintiff Brian Slitt's Reply in Support of His Motion to Amend Complaint Based on Newly Discovered Evidence
  67. Plaintiff Brian Slitt's Notice of Filing
  68. Rule 9A List of Documents Applies To: Slitt, Brian (Plaintiff)
  69. Endorsement on Motion to Amend Complaint Based on Newly Discovered Evidence (#30.0): DENIED After review. the proposed late payments of the Q2 and Q3 commissions have long been known to plaintiff. An effort to add them to the case now is untimely and prejudicial. to the extent plaintiff seeks to clarify that his breach of contract claim includes a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, amendment is unnecessary. every contract contains an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and any breach of contract can reasonably be read to include an allegation that the implied contract was breached as well. As such, amendment for such a clarifying purpose is unnecessary. (dated 4/10/24) Notice sent 4/11/24
  70. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  71. Plaintiff, Defendant Brian Slitt, Inmarket Corp's Joint Motion to Cancel the Pre-Trial Conference and Issue 60-Day NISI Order
  72. ORDER of dismissal nisi entered after action was reported settled; Agreement or Stipulation shall be filed in this court by 07/26/2024
  73. Endorsement on Motion to cancel the pre-trial conference and issue 60-day nisi order (#33.0): ALLOWED Allowed. The hearing scheduled for today is CNACELLED. The Clerk shall issue a 60-day nisi order. (Dated 5/23/24) (Notice sent 5/29/24)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more