Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(56989596) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAWN E SANDERSON [email protected]
- PURSUANT TO THE 05/07/2025 NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY, THE COURT HAS BEEN ADVISED THAT DEFENDANT HAS FILED FOR BANKRUPTCY (CASE NO.25-11821 U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO). PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE HAVE BEEN STAYED (11 USC SEC. 362). THE STAY SHALL BE REMOVED ONLY UPON MOTION. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
- GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 GENISYS CREDIT UNION ATTORNEY DAWN E SANDERSON 0072299 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY
- GARNISHMENT CASE NUMBER GR25 028159
- CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/24/2025 AT 11:15 AM. PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 21, PART I, THE COURT WILL CONDUCT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. DISCOVERY SCHEDULE, AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY, EXCHANGE OF EXPERT REPORTS, DATE FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION, ETC., SHALL BE RESOLVED AND INCLUDED IN A BINDING DECREE AND ORDER FORMALIZED. ALL COUNSEL ATTENDING SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A BINDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL OTHER PARTIES AND CONTACT THE COURT AT THE APPOINTED TIME AT 216-443-8618. PARTIES SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS DISCOVERY PROGRESS AND SCHEDULING MATTERS, ETC. COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES SHALL FOLLOW THE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN CIVIL RULE 26(F) IN PREPARATION FOR THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. NOTICE ISSUED
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(56649633) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: EDGAR A. NIEVES 3012 SARATOGA AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44109
- JUDGMENT ENTRY(56649632) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAWN E SANDERSON [email protected]
- MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 03/05/2025, IS GRANTED. PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S PREVIOUS ORDER, THE 04/11/2025 DEFAULT HEARING WAS NOT HELD IN PERSON. IN ITS PREVIOUS ENTRY, THE COURT PUT ALL PARTIES ON NOTICE THAT ITS DECISION WILL BE BASED UPON THE PARTIES' MOTIONS, PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD. THEREFORE, BECAUSE ALL PARTIES WERE GIVEN ADEQUATE NOTICE AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD, A HEARING WAS NOT REQUIRED. THE COURT HAS REVIEWED PLAINTIFF'S MOTION AND ACCOMPANYING EVIDENCE. THE DOCKET SHOWS THAT DEFENDANT HAS NOT FILED A RESPONSE ALTHOUGH GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO. ACCORDINGLY, BASED UPON ITS REVIEW, THE COURT FINDS THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS WELL-TAKEN. ON COUNT ONE OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, THE COURT ENTERS JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,374.49, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE FROM DATE OF JUDGMENT, AND COSTS OF THE WITHIN ACTION. THERE IS NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY. IT IS SO ORDERED. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
- AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 GENISYS CREDIT UNION ATTORNEY DAWN E SANDERSON 0072299 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT
- CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 04/16/2025 AT 03:00 PM IS CANCELLED.
- A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET SHOWS THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO FILE AN ANSWER AND THUS IS IN DEFAULT. THE CMC BY PHONE SET ON 04/16/2025 IS CANCELLED. PLAINTIFF FILED A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON 03/05/25. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 04/11/2025 AT 09:00 AM. THE DEFAULT HEARING WILL NOT BE HELD IN PERSON OR BY TELEPHONE. THE COURT'S DECISION SHALL BE BASED UPON THE PARTIES' MOTIONS, PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD. IN ORDER FOR THE DEFAULT HEARING TO GO FORWARD, PLAINTIFF MUST PROVIDE TO THE COURT: (1) A JUDGMENT ENTRY; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT ACCORDING TO STATUTE AND RULES, SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WERE MET; (3) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT A SEARCH HAS BEEN CONDUCTED AND DEFENDANT IS NOT A CURRENT MEMBER OF THE MILITARY; AND (4) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF, OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE, PROVING DAMAGES. ALL EVIDENCE AND REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. NOTICE ISSUED
- MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
- SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR NIEVES/EDGAR/A. 03/04/2025 17:01:57
- SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR SANDERSON/DAWN/E 03/04/2025 17:01:57
- CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/16/2025 AT 03:00 PM. PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 21, PART I, THE COURT WILL CONDUCT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. DISCOVERY SCHEDULE, AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY, EXCHANGE OF EXPERT REPORTS, DATE FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION, ETC., SHALL BE RESOLVED AND INCLUDED IN A BINDING DECREE AND ORDER FORMALIZED. ALL COUNSEL ATTENDING SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A BINDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER . PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL OTHER PARTIES AND CONTACT THE COURT AT THE APPOINTED TIME AT 216-443-8618. PARTIES SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS DISCOVERY PROGRESS AND SCHEDULING MATTERS, ETC. COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES SHALL FOLLOW THE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN CIVIL RULE 26(F) IN PREPARATION FOR THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
- SUMS COMPLAINT(55977722) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: EDGAR A. NIEVES 3012 SARATOGA AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44109 ANSWER DATE: 02/27/2025
- SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
- WRIT FEE
- REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE
- CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55737356 RETURNED 1/25/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT NIEVES/EDGAR/A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
- SUMS COMPLAINT(55737356) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: EDGAR A. NIEVES 3012 SARATOGA AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44109
- SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
- WRIT FEE
- JUDGE ASHLEY KILBANE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
- LEGAL RESEARCH
- LEGAL NEWS
- LEGAL AID
- COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
- COMPUTER FEE
- CLERK'S FEE
- DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAWN E SANDERSON
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In