Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-10
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 22 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.a.
Defendant Richard Santiago
Photo of Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Judge

Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT AMT: $17,430.11 RENDERED BY: CP CUYAHOGA ORIGINATING CASE NO.: CV25109980 JUDGMENT LIEN CASE#: JL25313272 CREDITOR: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. DEBTOR: RICHARD L SANTIAGO INTEREST AT: 0% INTEREST FROM DATE: 05/01/2025 COSTS: 0.00 JUDGMENT DATE: 05/01/2025 DOCKET (JOURNAL): IMAGE PAGE: IMAGE TIME FILED: 10/08/2025 14:10:17 LIEN COST: 25 PAID BY: STENGER & STENGER P.C. SERIAL NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER:
  3. REFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO STENGER & STENGER P.C.
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56851913) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RICHARD SANTIAGO 23835 GREENWOOD RD EUCLID, OH 44117
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(56851912) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOSEPH M. JAMMAL [email protected]
  6. THIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A DEFAULT HEARING ON MAY 1, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND THERE WAS NO APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT. THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED MARCH 31, 2025, IS GRANTED, AND JUDGMENT ON THE COMPLAINT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. AND AGAINST DEFENDANT RICHARD L SANTIAGO IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,430.11. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ATTORNEY JOSEPH M. JAMMAL 0096514 MILITARY SERVICE
  8. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  9. THIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON MARCH 27, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND THERE WAS NO APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT, WHO IS IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER. THE PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT NO LATER THAN APRIL 17, 2025, AND A HEARING ON THE ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SET AS FOLLOWS: DEFAULT HEARING IS SET FOR 05/01/2025 AT 10:00 AM IN COURTROOM 18-D. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY SHALL BRING JUDGMENT ENTRY; AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT ACCORDING TO STATUTE AND RULES, SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WERE COMPLIED WITH; AND AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF, OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE, PROVING DAMAGES. PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL. SAID LETTER ALSO SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE: "JUDGMENT MAY BE RENDERED AGAINST YOU." NOTICE ISSUED
  10. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 03/27/2025 AT 10:00 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. THE DEFENDANT HAS UNTIL FEBRUARY 20, 2025 TO FILE AN ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT. IF THE DEFENDANT IS IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER AFTER THAT DATE, THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE CONVERTED TO A DEFAULT HEARING IF THE PLAINTIFF FILES A CIVIL RULE 55 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT NO LATER THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE MARCH 27, 2025. THE DEFENDANT IS NOTIFIED THAT A MONEY JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST HIM AT A DEFAULT HEARING. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55811365 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/16/2025 SANTIAGO/RICHARD/ PROCESSED BY COC 01/22/2025.
  12. SUMS COMPLAINT(55811365) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RICHARD SANTIAGO 23835 GREENWOOD RD EUCLID, OH 44117
  13. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  14. WRIT FEE
  15. JUDGE JOHN P O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  16. LEGAL RESEARCH
  17. LEGAL NEWS
  18. LEGAL AID
  19. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  20. COMPUTER FEE
  21. CLERK'S FEE
  22. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JOSEPH M. JAMMAL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase