Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-08
Type Annulment Of Marriage
Docket 42 entries
Disposition Judgment
Photo of Hon. Wilkie David M

Judge

Hon. Wilkie David M

Kay County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR ANNULMENT OF MARRIAGE
  2. LAW LIBRARY
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION
  4. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE-EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  5. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  9. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  11. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  14. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  15. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  16. SUMMONS ISSUED TO SHF TO SERVE:JEFFREY LUCAS
  17. SHERIFF FEE
  18. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  19. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  20. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  21. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  22. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  23. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  24. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  25. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  26. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  27. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  28. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  29. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  30. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  31. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  32. RETURN OF ORIGINAL SUMMONS SERVING: JEFFREY LUCAS ON 7-17-24 BY DEPUTY WATHOR
  33. RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR ANNULMENT FO MARRIAGE AND MOTION TO DISMISS, AND COURTCLAIM OF PEITITON FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE/RESPONSE (EMAILED COPY)
  34. RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR ANNULMENT FO MARRIAGE AND MOTION TO DISMISS, AND COURTCLAIM OF PEITITON FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE/RESPONSE (ORIGINAL)
  35. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  36. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  37. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  38. RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  39. PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  40. DOMESTIC COURT MINUTE
  41. CM: WILKIE ME CAUSE COMES ON FOR PETR'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. PETR APPEARS WITH ATTY BRADY BURR. RESP APPEARS WITH ATTY THOMAS SWAFFORD. PETR'S ATTY GIVES OPENING STATEMENT. RESP'S ATTY GIVES RESPONSE. PETR'S ATTY GIVES RESPONSE. COURT ORDERS ATTY'S TO PROVIDE CASE LAW THAT THEY ARE RELYING ON BY JANUARY 17, 2025. ATTY'S ARE TO GET WITH LENNIS ON FEBRUARY 3, 2025 TO SET DATE.
  42. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more