Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Sussex County

Court

Sussex County

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-31
Status NEW - NEW
Type Cr Personal Injury Auto
Docket 65 entries
Disposition Default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Davis, Jarius
Defendant Gillette, Cameron Michael
Photo of Hon. Robinson Jr Robert H

Judge

Hon. Robinson Jr Robert H

Sussex County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING PERS INJURY AUTO
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  6. ANSWER & CROSSCLAIM
  7. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  8. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  9. ANSWER & CROSSCLAIM
  10. ANSWER FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES
  11. ANSWER TO THE CROSSCLAIM
  12. LETTER
  13. STATUS CASE LETTER
  14. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  15. LETTER
  16. RESPONSE
  17. RE-NOTICE
  18. EVENT CONTINUED / RESCHEDULED
  19. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  20. ANSWER & CROSSCLAIM
  21. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  22. NOTICE
  23. MOTION WITHDRAWN
  24. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  25. STATUS CASE LETTER
  26. CASE STATUS REQUEST LETTER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 LETTER FROM MARCO SUAREZ, JUDICIAL CASE MANAGER, TO COUNSEL. RE: THIS MATTER CANNOT PROCEED BECAUSE AN ACTION IS NEEDED BY THE PARTIES AS TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM AND AS TO THE PENDING CROSSCLAIM(S) AGAINST DEFENDANT, JENNIFER L. MURPHY. PLEASE REPORT BACK TO THE COURT ON THE STATUS OF THIS CASE WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS. ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74371865
  27. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  28. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 26, 2024 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT [AS TO DEFENDANT JENNIFER L. MURPHY] (RAN JI) NOTICE OF MOTION SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ON FRIDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2024, AT 1:00 P.M. PROPOSED ORDER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74581067
  29. LETTER
  30. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 10, 2024 LETTER FROM JAMES J. HORNING, JR., ESQUIRE, TO JUDGE ROBINSON. RE: ADVISING THAT DEFENDANT CAMERON GILLETTE TAKES NO POSITION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT, JENNIFER L. MURPHY. ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74721128
  31. RESPONSE
  32. RESPONSE BY THE COURT DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 15, 2024 RESPONSE FROM JUDGE ROBERT H. ROBINSON, JR. TO ATTORNEY HORNING'S LETTER DATED OCTOBER 9, 2024. HIS HONOR NOTES MR. HORNING IS EXCUSED FROM ATTENDING THE HEARING. ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74747061
  33. RE-NOTICE
  34. RE-NOTICE OF MOTION DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 15, 2024 RE-NOTICE OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [AS TO DEFENDANT JENNIFER L. MURPHY], RESCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2024, AT 1:00 P.M. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74749349
  35. EVENT CONTINUED / RESCHEDULED
  36. CIVIL MOTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 18, 2024 - MS REMOVED FROM CALENDAR. CONTINUED / RESCHEDULED BY PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL. RE-NOTICED FOR FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2024, AT 1:00 P.M. DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 15, 2024
  37. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  38. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 17, 2024 JENNIFER A. SUTTON, ESQUIRE, OF MARGOLIS EDELSTEIN, HEREBY ENTERS HER APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT, JENNIFER L. MURPHY. ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74768672
  39. ANSWER & CROSSCLAIM
  40. ANSWER AND CROSSCLAIM DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 25, 2024 DEFENDANT JENNIFER L. MURPHY'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES; CROSSCLAIM FOR CONTRIBUTION AND/OR INDEMNIFICATION AGAINST CO-DEFENDANTS; AND ANSWERS TO ALL PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE CROSSCLAIMS (JENNIFER A. SUTTON) CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT ANSWERS TO FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74857333
  41. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  42. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 25, 2024 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT JENNIFER L. MURPHY'S ANSWER & CROSSCLAIM. ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74861036
  43. NOTICE
  44. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 2, 2024 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2024, AT 1:00 P.M. (RAN JI) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74922069
  45. MOTION WITHDRAWN
  46. CIVIL MOTION SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 15, 2024 - MS REMOVED FROM CALENDAR. WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL. DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 1, 2024
  47. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  48. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING - MS (TO BE SCHEDULED TOGETHER WITH OTHER FOUR RELATED SUSSEX COUNTY MATTERS) DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 3, 2024
  49. LETTER
  50. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 7, 2024 LETTER FROM MARGARET THATCHER TO COUNSEL RE: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY JANUARY 13, 2025 AT 9 A.M. ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 75157779

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more