Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- INIT FILING TRANSFER CCP
- RECEIPT FILED
- MOTION TO DISMISS
- NOTICE
- MOTION REMOVED FROM CALENDAR
- RESPONSE
- CIVIL MOTION (GENERAL)
- MOTION REMOVED FROM CALENDAR
- CIVIL MOTION HEARING HELD
- ORDER
- JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
- ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM
- LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING
- LETTER
- SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD
- MOTION SCHEDULED FOR 08-16-2024 - SB REMOVED FROM CALENDAR - RENOTICED BACK TO 08-02-2024 DATE DOCKETED: JULY 16, 2024
- CIVIL MOTION HEARING HELD
- CIVIL MOTION HELD 08-02-2024 - JUDGE MARK H. CONNER PRESIDING - SB DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMSS - DENIED - PLAINTIFF'S MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CLAIM DENIED, CLAIM OF FALSE IMPRISONMENT, GRANTED. PARTIES ARE TO PROCEED WITH CASE SCHEDULING. DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 2, 2024
- ORDER
- ORDER DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 3, 2024 ORDER SIGNED BY MARK H. CONNER ON 08-02-2024. IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION AND MEMORANDUM TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12b6 AND THE RESPONSE THERETO, THE MOTION HEREBY IS GRANTED IN PART. THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FOR THE REASONS STATED ON THE RECORD THE FALSE IMPRISONMENT CLAIM IS DISMISSED. THE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CLAIM SURVIVES THE MOTION TO DISMISS. DEFENDANT TO FILE AN ANSWER &THE PARTIES ARE TO PROCEED TO CASE SCHEDULING. ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 73898763
- JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
- JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 3, 2024 CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FORM FROM 08-02-2024 MOTIONS. ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 73899169
- ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM
- ANSWER TO COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 20, 2024 ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM (PAUL ENTERLINE) ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 74077371
- LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING
- LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING (THE TICKLER FOR THIS WAS MARKED COMPLETED,THEREFORE DID NOT SHOW ON THE LIST WHEN IT GETS RAN) DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 20, 2024
- LETTER
- LETTER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 14, 2024 LETTER FROM MARGARET THATCHER TO LITIGANT AND COUNSEL RE: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 30, 2024 AT 9 A.M. ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74321319
- SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD
- SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD ON 10-30-24 - MMT COMMISSIONER ALICIA B. HOWARD PRESIDING - DATES FOR THE SCHEDULING ORDER WERE ESTABLISHED DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 30, 2024
- SCHEDULING ORDER
- SCHEDULING ORDER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 7, 2024 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER SIGNED BY COMMISSIONER ALICIA B. HOWARD ON 11-06-2024. - MOTIONS TO AMEND SHALL BE FILED BY 01-31-2025; - PLAINTIFF SHALL IDENTIFY EXPERTS BY 04-30-2025; - DEFENDANT SHALL IDENTIFY EXPERTS BY 08-29-2025; - DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY 10-31-2025; - DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL BE FILED BY 12-05-2025; - RESPONSES SHALL BE FILED BY 02-05-2026; - PRE-TRIAL STIPULATION DUE BY 06-24-2026; - PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 07-01-2026 AT 9:15 AM; - TRIAL FEE DUE BY 07-01-2026; - 3 DAY JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 08-03-2026 AT 9:30 AM ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 74957442
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In