Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Sussex County

Court

Sussex County

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-20
Status CSO - CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
Type Cr Personal Injury Auto
Docket 36 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Silano, Raquel
Defendant Henschen, Brandon
Photo of Hon. Karsnitz Craig A

Judge

Hon. Karsnitz Craig A

Sussex County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING PERS INJURY AUTO
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  6. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  7. ANSWER
  8. LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING
  9. LETTER
  10. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULE
  11. LETTER
  12. LETTER
  13. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD
  14. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 14, 2024 DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT (JEFFREEY A. YOUNG) ANSWERS TO FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION DIRECTED TO THE PLAINTIFF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 74020014
  15. LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING
  16. LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 14, 2024
  17. LETTER
  18. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 17, 2024 LETTER FROM MARGARET THATCHER TO COUNSEL RE: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 AT 9:15 A.M. ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74070872
  19. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULE
  20. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 9-25-24 WAS NOT HELD, COUNSEL DID NOT CALL IN / THIS WILL BE RESCHEDULED - MMT DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
  21. LETTER
  22. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 26, 2024 LETTER FROM TIMOTHY A DILLON, ESQ TO THE COURT RE: APOLOGIZING FOR MISSING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 74586796
  23. LETTER
  24. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 26, 2024 LETTER FROM MARGARET THATCHER TO COUNSEL RE: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 30, 2024 AT 9:30 A.M. (RESCHEDULED FROM SEPTEMBER 25, 2024). ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74587190
  25. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD
  26. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD ON 10-30-24 - MMT COMMISSIONER ALICIA B. HOWARD PRESIDING - DATES FOR THE SCHEDULING ORDER WERE ESTABLISHED DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 30, 2024
  27. SCHEDULING ORDER
  28. SCHEDULING ORDER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 7, 2024 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER SIGNED BY COMMISSIONER ALICIA B. HOWARD, FILED 11-6-24. IT IS ORDERED THAT: - MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ARE TO BE FILED BY 10-3-25 AND RESPONSES BY 10-23-25; - PRETRIAL STIPULATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN NOON ON 11-5-25; - TRIAL FEE IS DUE NO LATER THAN 11-12-25; - PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR 11-12-25 AT 9:15 A.M.; - FOUR DAY JURY TRIAL IS SCHEDULED FOR 12-15-25 AT 9:30 A.M. ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74953348

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more