Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Sussex County

Court

Sussex County

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-31
Status CSO - CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
Type Cs Personal Injury
Docket 33 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Edmonds, Kim
Defendant Smith, Jennifer
Photo of Hon. Karsnitz Craig A

Judge

Hon. Karsnitz Craig A

Sussex County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING PERSONAL INJURY
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  5. ANSWER
  6. LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING
  7. LETTER
  8. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  9. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULE
  10. LETTER
  11. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  12. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD
  13. LETTER
  14. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 LETTER FROM MARGARET THATCHER TO COUNSEL RE: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2024 AT 9:15 A.M. ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74368031
  15. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  16. NOTICE OF SERVICE DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF. ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 74370800
  17. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULE
  18. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 10-30-24 WAS NOT HELD, COUNSEL DID NOT CALL IN / THEY WERE EMAILED TO LET THE COURT KNOW IF THE CASE HAD SETTLED OR A NEW DATE IS NEEDED - MMT (IF NEW DATE, IT WILL BE 12-9-24 AT 9:15 A.M.) DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 30, 2024
  19. LETTER
  20. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 13, 2024 LETTER FROM MARGARET THATCHER TO COUNSEL RE: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY DECEMBER 9, 2024 AT 9:15 A.M. (RESCHEDULED FROM OCTOBER 30, 2024). ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74988627
  21. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  22. NOTICE OF SERVICE DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 19, 2024 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S INTERROGATORIES AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT'S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 75020324
  23. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD
  24. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD ON 12-9-24 - MMT COMMISSIONER ALICIA B. HOWARD PRESIDING - DATES FOR THE SCHEDULING ORDER WERE ESTABLISHED DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 9, 2024
  25. SCHEDULING ORDER
  26. SCHEDULING ORDER DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 10, 2024 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER SIGNED BY COMMISSIONER ALICIA B. HOWARD ON 12-6-24. IT IS ORDERED THAT: - MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ARE TO BE FILED BY 2-12-26 AND RESPONSES BY 3-4-26; - PRETRIAL STIPULATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN NOON ON 3-17-26; - TRIAL FEE IS DUE NO LATER THAN 3-24-26; - PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR 3-24-26 AT 9 A.M.; - THREE DAY JURY TRIAL IS SCHEDULED FOR 4-20-26 AT 9:30 A.M. ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 75174270

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more