Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Sussex County

Court

Sussex County

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-29
Status NEW - NEW
Type Lm Mortgage
Docket 52 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Local Pro Funding Llc
Defendant Stoney Creek Realty Llc
Photo of Hon. Karsnitz Craig A

Judge

Hon. Karsnitz Craig A

Sussex County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING MORTGAGE
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. ALIAS SUMMONS
  6. WRIT ISSUED
  7. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  8. MOTION SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER
  9. ORDER
  10. PLURIES PRAECIPE
  11. WRIT ISSUED
  12. LETTER
  13. LETTER
  14. ORDER
  15. MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
  16. ORDER
  17. LETTER
  18. MOTION TO STRIKE
  19. RESPONSE
  20. PLURIES PRAECIPE & SUMMONS FILED DATE DOCKETED: JULY 26, 2024 FIRST PLURIES PRAECIPE - AS TO DEFENDANT BRIAN MARSTON. FIRST PLURIES SUMMONS - SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER O'ROURKE INVESTIGATIVE ASSOCIATES ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73799132
  21. WRIT ISSUED
  22. WRIT ISSUED DATE DOCKETED: JULY 27, 2024 WRIT ISSUED TO SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER O'ROURKE INVESTIGATIVE ASSOCIATES, FOR SERVICE UPON BRIAN MARSTON. (FORWARDED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL VIA MAIL) ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73807189
  23. LETTER
  24. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 30, 2024 LETTER FROM DEFENDANT BRIAN MARSTON TO THE COURT, FILED JULY 29, 2024 (PRO SE). RE: ASKING THE COURT TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTION DATED JULY 24, 2024. ALSO INFORMING THE PARTIES THAT DEFENDANT WAS REPRESENTED BY HIS HONOR PRIOR TO BECOMING A JUDGE, IN "GARRISON HOMES V. MARSTON." ATTACHMENTS - COPY OF ENVELOPE; E-MAILS; LETTER FROM THE POWELL FIRM; JP COURT CERTIFICATE OF ARTIFICIAL ENTITY ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 73830059
  25. LETTER
  26. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 31, 2024 LETTER FROM GRACIELA GARCIA-MIGUEL, JUDICIAL CASE MANAGER, TO COUNSEL. RE: ADVISING THAT THIS CASE HAS BEEN REASSIGNED TO JUDGE ROBERT H. ROBINSON, JR. (COPY FORWARDED TO DEFENDANT BRIAN MARSTON VIA MAIL 7/31 - MS) ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73837640
  27. ORDER
  28. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 15, 2024 ORDER LETTER FROM JUDGE ROBINSON TO DEFENDANT BRIAN MARSTON, SIGNED AUGUST 14, 2024. RE: IN RESPONSE TO YOUR JULY 29, 2024 LETTER, YOUR REQUEST TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER IS DENIED. ATTACHMENT - SHERIFF'S NON-EST RETURN FILED MAY 16, 2024 (COPY FORWARDED TO MR. MARSTON VIA MAIL - MS) ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74050114
  29. MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
  30. MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR SERVICE DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 10, 2024 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT (DAIRE J. PYLE) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE NOTICE OF MOTION TO BE HEARD AT THE CONVENIENCE OF THE COURT PROPOSED ORDER ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74721008
  31. ORDER
  32. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 11, 2024 ORDER SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT H. ROBINSON, JR. ON OCTOBER 10, 2024. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED ONE-HUNDRED-TWENTY (120) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO COMPLETE SERVICE IN THIS MATTER IN A MATTER CONSISTENT WITH THE SUPERIOR COURT RULES. ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74733042
  33. LETTER
  34. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 26, 2024 LETTER FROM DEFENDANT BRIAN MARSTON TO THE COURT, FILED NOVEMBER 25, 2024. RE: PROVIDING AN STATUS OF THIS MATTER AND RELAYING SOME CONCERNS AS TO PLAINTIFF'S ACTIONS. ONCE THE COURT SCHEDULES HEARINGS, I FULLY INTEND ON FILING A COUNTERCLAIM FOR DAMAGES PERSONALLY AND PROFESSIONALLY, AS WELL AS NUMEROUS SUBPOENAS FOR TESTIMONY. ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 75087756
  35. MOTION TO STRIKE
  36. MOTION TO STRIKE DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 12, 2024 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' LETTER FILED ON NOVEMBER 25, 2024 AT DOCKET INDEX NO. 16, FROM THE DOCKET (CATHERINE DI LORENZO) PROPOSED ORDER NOTICE OF MOTION TO BE HEARD AT THE CONVENIENCE OF THE COURT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 75191905
  37. RESPONSE
  38. RESPONSE DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 14, 2024 DEFENDANT BRIAN MARSTON'S RESPONSE LETTER TO PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' LETTER FILED ON NOVEMBER 25, 2024 AT DOCKET INDEX NO. 16, FROM THE DOCKET," FILED DECEMBER 12, 2024 (PRO SE) EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT D EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT F EXHIBIT G EXHIBIT H EXHIBIT I EXHIBIT J EXHIBIT K EXHIBIT L EXHIBIT M ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 75216048
  39. LETTER
  40. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 17, 2024 LETTER FROM CATHERINE DI LORENZO, ESQUIRE, TO JUDGE ROBINSON. RE: REQUESTING ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF FOR PERMISSION TO FILE A REPLY TO DEFENDANT MARSTON'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE. ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 75229665

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more