Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-02
Status INACTIVE
Type Quiet Title
Docket 50 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Mineral Development, Inc.
Defendant Charlotte Mccoy|Katherine Haselberger|Elizabeth Glick|Dean Christman|Gulfport Appalachia, Llc C/o Corporation Services Company, Statutory Agent|3 Mcacres, Llc C/o Charlotte Mcoy, Statutory Agent
Photo of Hon. William F B Vodrey

Judge

Hon. William F B Vodrey

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. -------------------- NOTICE OF APPEAL -------------------- CA NO. 115181 NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PLTF. APPELLANT W/A 9A PRAECIPE AND DOCKETING STATEMENT ON THE REGULAR CALENDAR.
  3. NOTICE OF APPEAL-DOCKETING STATEMENT FILED PRAECPE AND DOCKETING STATEMENT
  4. NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED NOTICE OF APPEAL
  5. DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION, FILED 03/03/2025, IS DENIED AS MOOT, AS THE CASE WAS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BY SEPARATE ORDER. DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION, FILED 02/06/2025, IS DENIED AS MOOT, AS THE CASE WAS ALREADY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BY SEPARATE ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S ORDER OF 4/8/25 AND THE PARTIES FAILURE TO SHOW CAUSE, THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE LOCAL RULE'S REQUIREMENT TO FILE "GUARANTEED EVIDENCE OF THE STATE OF THE RECORD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION" IS NECESSARY FOR THE COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE RELEVANT INTERESTS, WHETHER IT HAS JURISDICTION OVER ALL OF THE INDISPENSIBLE PARTIES, AND CONSQUENTLY WHETHER IT CAN ISSUE A FINAL ORDER. THE GUARANTEE NEED NOT CONFIRM A PLAINTIFF'S QUIET TITLE CLAIM; BUT MERELY GUARANTEE THAT A THOROUGH SEARCH OF THE RECORDS HAS BEEN PERFORMED, SO THAT A TITLE COMPANY IS LIABLE IF A RECORDED INTEREST HOLDER HAS BEEN MISSED BY ITS SEARCH (UNDERMINING THE FINALITY OF ANY JUDGMENT RENDERED). IT IS NO LESS NECESSARY IN QUIET TITLE CASES, EVEN THOUGH NO JUDICIAL SALE IS SOUGHT. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). NOTICE ISSUED
  7. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 MINERAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. ATTORNEY DANIEL P. CORCORAN 0083512 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO COURT'S APRIL 8, 2025 JOURNAL ENTRY REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE A PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT UNDER LOCAL RULE 24(A)
  8. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 MINERAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. ATTORNEY DANIEL P. CORCORAN 0083512 PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  9. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CHARLOTTE MCCOY(D1), KATHERINE HASELBERGER(D2), ELIZABETH GLICK(D3), DEAN CHRISTMAN(D4) and GULFPORT APPALACHIA, LLC(D5) ATTORNEY MATTHEW W ONEST 0087907 DEFENDANTS' JOINT RESPONSE TO COURT'S APRIL 8, 2025, JOURNAL ENTRY REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE A PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT UNDER LOCAL RULE 24(A)
  10. UPON REVIEW OF THE DOCKET, AND PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 24(C), ALL PARTIES MUST SHOW CAUSE WHY THE CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULE 24(A) BY 4/22/25. FAILURE TO SHOW CAUSE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CHARLOTTE MCCOY(D1), KATHERINE HASELBERGER(D2), ELIZABETH GLICK(D3), DEAN CHRISTMAN(D4), GULFPORT APPALACHIA, LLC(D5) and 3 MCACRES, LLC(D6) ATTORNEY MATTHEW W ONEST 0087907 REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
  12. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 MINERAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. ATTORNEY DANIEL P. CORCORAN 0083512 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
  13. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
  14. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CHARLOTTE MCCOY(D1), KATHERINE HASELBERGER(D2), ELIZABETH GLICK(D3), DEAN CHRISTMAN(D4) and GULFPORT APPALACHIA, LLC(D5) ATTORNEY JOHN C. FERRELL 0097727 REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
  15. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DANIEL P. CORCORAN
  16. AMENDED COMPLAINT $75 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
  17. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 MINERAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. ATTORNEY DANIEL P. CORCORAN 0083512 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
  18. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55733215 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/13/2025 MCCOY/CHARLOTTE/ PROCESSED BY COC 02/19/2025.
  19. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55733217 RETURNED 01/23/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT GLICK/ELIZABETH/ - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  20. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED DEFENDANT(S) CHARLOTTE MCCOY(D1), KATHERINE HASELBERGER(D2), ELIZABETH GLICK(D3) and DEAN CHRISTMAN(D4) MATTHEW W ONEST 0087907. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  21. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
  22. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55733217 RETURNED 1/23/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT GLICK/ELIZABETH/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  23. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55733219 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/10/2025 GULFPORT APPALACHIA, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 01/15/2025.
  24. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55733218 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/11/2025 CHRISTMAN/DEAN/ PROCESSED BY COC 01/15/2025.
  25. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55733216 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/10/2025 HASELBERGER/KATHERINE/ PROCESSED BY COC 01/15/2025.
  26. SUMS COMPLAINT(55733219) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GULFPORT APPALACHIA, LLC 1160 DUBLIN ROAD, SUITE 400 COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  27. SUMS COMPLAINT(55733218) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DEAN CHRISTMAN 47660 STATE ROUTE 800 WOODSFIELD, OH 43793
  28. SUMS COMPLAINT(55733217) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ELIZABETH GLICK 113 W. MAIN STREET ST. CLAIRSVILLE, OH 43950
  29. SUMS COMPLAINT(55733216) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KATHERINE HASELBERGER 203 MAPLE AVENUE WOODSFIELD, OH 43793
  30. SUMS COMPLAINT(55733215) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHARLOTTE MCCOY 10377 PINE NEEDLE TRAIL STRONGSVILLE, OH 44149
  31. MAGISTRATE PAUL LUCAS ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  32. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. NOTICE ISSUED
  33. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  35. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  36. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  37. WRIT FEE
  38. WRIT FEE
  39. WRIT FEE
  40. WRIT FEE
  41. WRIT FEE
  42. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  43. JUDGE WILLIAM F. B. VODREY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  44. LEGAL RESEARCH
  45. LEGAL NEWS
  46. LEGAL AID
  47. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  48. COMPUTER FEE
  49. CLERK'S FEE
  50. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DANIEL P. CORCORAN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more