Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Sussex County

Court

Sussex County

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-05
Status NEW - NEW
Type Cr Personal Injury Auto
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Gillette, Cameron
Defendant Murphy Jr., Charles R
Photo of Hon. Karsnitz Craig A

Judge

Hon. Karsnitz Craig A

Sussex County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING PERS INJURY AUTO
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  6. ANSWER
  7. LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING
  8. LETTER
  9. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULE
  10. LETTER
  11. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  12. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: JULY 20, 2024 DEFENDANTS CHARLES R. MUPRHY, JR. AND CHARLES R. MURPHY'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (BRIAN T. MCNELIS) ANSWERS TO FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 73725214
  13. LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING
  14. LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING DATE DOCKETED: JULY 22, 2024
  15. LETTER
  16. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 25, 2024 LETTER FROM MARGARET THATCHER, JUDICIAL CASE MANAGER, TO COUNSEL. RE: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2024, AT 9:45 A.M. ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 73779017
  17. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULE
  18. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 2024 REMOVED FROM THE CALENDAR PER EMAIL FROM CASE MANAGER MARCO, NOTING JUDGE ROBINSON IS HAVING ALL MURPHY/GILLETTE CASES ASSIGNED TO HIM AND WILL SET ONE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO GOVERN ALL CASES - MMT DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 22, 2024
  19. LETTER
  20. LETTER - JUDGE RE-ASSIGNMENT DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 4, 2024 LETTER FROM JUDGE ROBERT H. ROBINSON, JR. TO ALL PARTIES, SIGNED SEPTEMBER 3, 2024. RE: SIX (6) CASES FILED IN SUSSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STEM FROM A SINGLE COLLISION. TO ENSURE THE CASES PROCEED SMOOTHLY, THEY WILL BE ASSIGNED TO ME. ONCE ANSWERS ARE FILED IN ALL THE CASES, I WILL CONDUCT A ZOOM CONFERENCE TO CREATE A SINGLE SCHEDULING ORDER APPLICABLE TO ALL CASES. ANY ALREADY-ISSUED SCHEDULING ORDERS WILL BE REPLACED AT THAT TIME. EACH CASE WILL RECEIVE ITS OWN TRIAL DATE. PLEASE BRING ANY CONCERNS TO MY ATTENTION IN ADVANCE OF THE CONFERENCE(S). ACCEPTED BY: MS TRANSACTION ID: 74217527
  21. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  22. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING - MS (TO BE SCHEDULED TOGETHER WITH OTHER FOUR RELATED SUSSEX COUNTY MATTERS) DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 3, 2024
  23. LETTER
  24. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 7, 2024 LETTER FROM MARGARET THATCHER TO COUNSEL RE: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY JANUARY 13, 2025 AT 9 A.M. ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 75157731

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more