Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-12-18
Status Briefing Reinstated
Type Civil Appeal Family Law Other
Docket 45 entries
Photo of Hon. Crowley, Margaret

Judge

Hon. Crowley, Margaret

Nevada Appellate Court

Nevada

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Filing Fee Paid. $250.00 from Ford & Friedman, LLC. Check no. 1984. (SC)
  2. Filed SEALED Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.). (SC)
  3. Issued Notice of Referral to Settlement Program. This appeal may be assigned to the settlement program. Timelines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs are stayed. (SC)
  4. Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Issued Assignment Notice to NRAP 16 Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Margaret M. Crowley. (SC)
  5. Filed Appellant's Docketing Statement (SC)
  6. Filed Respondent's Response to Docketing Statement Civil Appeal.(SC)
  7. Filed ECAR/Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is appropriate for mediation and a settlement conference is scheduled for May 1, 2024, at 9:00 AM. Case Nos. 87774/87925. (SC)
  8. Filed Final Report/No Settlement. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. Case Nos. 87774/87925. (SC)
  9. Filed Order Consolidating Appeals and Reinstating Briefing. We consolidate these appeals for all appellate purposes. No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement. Appellant(s): 14 days transcript request; 90 days opening brief and appendix. Nos 87774/87925. (SC)
  10. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Appellant's transcript request form due: June 26, 2024. Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  11. Filed Appellant's Notice of Transcript Request Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  12. Filed Appellant's Notice of Transcript Request(SC)
  13. Filed Appellant's Motion to Extend Time for Request for Transcripts. Nos. 87774/87925(SC)
  14. Filed Appellant's Motion to Extend Time for Request for Transcripts. Nos. 87774/87925
  15. Filed Order Granting Motion. Appellant shall have until July 17, 2024, to file and serve a transcript request form with the district court, as well as a filed-stamped copy of the request with this court, which identifies the third-party transcription service, the dates of the hearings to be transcribed, and that otherwise complies with NRAP 9(a)(3)(C). Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  16. Filed Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested:05-17-2023 ; 09-13, 2023; 07-01-2024; 07-09-2024. To Third Party Transcription Service Provider: Turner Reporting & Caption Services Nos. 87774/87925(SC)
  17. Filed Appellant's Notice of Transcription Completion.(Third-party Transcription Provider, Turner Reporting & Captioning Services, Provided Certified Transcription from 05-17-2023 and 09-13,2023 hearings.) (SC)
  18. Filed Appellant's Notice of Transcription Completion.(Third-party Transcription Provider, Turner Reporting & Captioning Services, Provided Certified Transcription from 05-17-2023 and 09-13,2023 hearings.) (SC)
  19. Filed Order to Show Cause. Docket No. 87774 is an appeal from a July 3, 2023, post-divorce decree order awarding attorney fees and a November 7, 2023, order resolving a motion to alter or amend the order awarding attorney fees. Our initial review of the docketing statement and the other documents before this court reveals a potential jurisdictional defect. Accordingly, appellant shall have 30 days from the date of this order to show cause why the appeal in Docket No. 87774 should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Respondent may file any reply within 11 days of service of appellant's response. We caution appellant that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction may result in the dismissal of Docket No. 87774. Briefing of these consolidated appeals is suspended pending further order of this court. Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  20. Filed Appellant' s Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief(REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED ON 08-28-2024)Nos. 87774/87925(SC)
  21. Filed Appellant' s Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief(REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED ON 08-28-2024)Nos. 87774/87925
  22. Issued Notice of Rejection of Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (SC)
  23. Filed Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause why Appeal Should not be Dismissed. (SC)
  24. Filed Order Reinstating Briefing. This court reinstates the briefing schedule as follows. Appellants shall have 60 days from the date of this order to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). (SC)
  25. Filed Appellant's Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief(SC)
  26. ssued Approve Streamlined Extension. Streamlined extension approved. Answering Brief due: 01-27-2025. (SC)
  27. iled Appellant's Opening Brief Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  28. iled Appellant's Alphabetical Index Nos. 87774/87925(SC)
  29. iled Appellant's Alphabetical Index Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  30. iled Appellant's Appendix Volume I of III Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  31. iled Appellant's Appendix Volume II of III Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  32. iled Appellant's Appendix Volume III of III Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  33. iled Respondent's Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  34. ssued Approve Streamlined Extension. Streamlined extension approved. Answering Brief due: 03-26-2025 Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  35. iled Respondent's Answering Brief on Appeal (REJECTED PER PHONE CALL)(SC)
  36. iled Respondent's Answering Brief on Appeal (REJECTED PER PHONE CALL)(SC)
  37. iled Respondent's Answering Brief (Nos. 87774/87925)(SC)
  38. iled Respondent's Alphabetical Index Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  39. iled Respondent's Chronological Appendix Index Nos. 87774/87925(SC)
  40. iled Respondent's Appendix Volume I of III Nos. 87774/87925(SC)
  41. iled Respondent's Appendix Volume II of III Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  42. iled Respondent's Appendix Volume III of III Nos. 87774/87925 (SC)
  43. iled Appellant's Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief. Nos. 87774/87925. (SC)
  44. iled Approve Appellant's Streamlined Extension. Streamlined extension approved. Reply Brief due: May 27, 2025. Nos. 87774/87925. (SC)
  45. iled Notice of Mandatory Electronic Filing for Anthony Smith. All attorneys are required to file electronically. Nos. 87774/87925. (SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more