Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-12-17
Status Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Type Original Proceeding Criminal Mandamus
Docket 27 entries
Disposition dismiss

Docket Entries

  1. Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.(SC)
  2. Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  3. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Chronological Index. (SC)
  4. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Alphabetical Index. (SC)
  5. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  6. Filed Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  7. Filed Amended Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  8. Filed Amended Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Chronological Index. (SC)
  9. Filed Amended Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Alphabetical Index. (SC)
  10. Filed Second Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  11. Filed Second Amended Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  12. Filed Second Amended Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Alphabetical Index. (SC)
  13. Filed Second Amended Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Chronological Index. (SC)
  14. Filed Motion to Substitute Correct Counsel of Record for Real Party in Interest. (SC)
  15. Filed Order Granting Motion. Petitioner has filed a motion to correct the docket, explaining that the original writ petition filed in this matter listed the incorrect counsel for real party in interest. The motion is granted, and the clerk of this court is directed to correct the docket to reflect that Lyon County District Attorney Stephen B. Rye is counsel for real party in interest, rather than Washoe County Appellate Deputy District Attorney Jennifer Noble. (SC).
  16. Filed Motion for Stay Pending Resolution of Petition for Writ of Mandamus (SC)
  17. Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. Answer due: 7 days. Petitioner shall have 7 days from service of the answer to file and serve any reply. (SC)
  18. Filed Real Party in Interest Answer to Second Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus (STRICKEN PER 2/24/25 ORDER). (SC)
  19. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Answer to Writ Petition. Corrected Answer to Writ Petition due: 14 days. (SC)
  20. Filed Amended Answer to Second Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus (SC)
  21. Filed Petitioner's Reply to Answer to Second Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus (SC)
  22. Filed Order Granting Stay. Petitioner has moved to stay the district court proceedings pending this court's consideration of the petition, pointing out that the district court denied his motion for stay below. Respondent did not oppose the motion. Having considered the unopposed motion in light of the NRAP 8(c) factors, see State v. Robles-Nieves, 129 Nev. 537, 541, 306 P.3d 399, 402-03 (2013), we grant it and hereby stay the district court proceedings in CR22-5164. DH/LB/LS (SC)
  23. Filed Order to Show Cause. Petitioner shall have 7 days from the date of this order within which to show cause why this whit petition should not be dismissed as moot. Real party in interest shall have 7 days from when petitioner's response is served to file and serve any reply. (SC)
  24. Filed Petitioner's Response to Order to Show Cause(SC)
  25. Filed Real Party in Interest Reply to Response to Order to Show Cause(SC)
  26. Filed Order Dismissing Petition. "We dismiss this petition as moot." fn1[Given this disposition, we vacate the stay imposed by the March 14, 2025, order.] DH/LB/LS (SC)
  27. Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur.(SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more