Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Docket Entries
- Dismiss by Ct w/o Prejudice
- Order of Dismissal Movant was convinced of murder in the first degree in Cause NO. 22031-00035 in March 25, 2004. He was thereafter sentenced to life imprisonment without probation or parole. Movant sppealed his conviction, and the Court of Appeals affirmed Movant's conviction on April 19, 2005. State v. Bell, 161 S.W.3d 889 (Mo.App E.D. 2005) The mandate was issued on May 26, 2005. Movant timely filed a motion pursuant to Rule 29.15 in Cause No.2205P-04665. The Court denied Movant's Rule 29.15 motion following and evidentiary hearing on October 12, 2006. The denial of Movant's motion was affirmed on appeal on November 20, 2007. Bell v. State, 240 S.W.3d 738 (Mo.App. E.D. 2007). In 2009, Movant filed a motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 proceeding, which the COurt denied on September 9, 2009. In 2016 Movant filed another motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 oriceeding which in Court denied on May 24, 2016. On February 14, 2022, Movant filed a motion to recall the mandate in his original post-conviction appeal, which the Court of Appeals denied on March 2, 2022. Rule 29.15 (b) provides, "Failure to file a motion within the time provided by this Rule 29.15 shall constitute a complete waiver of any right to proceed under this Rule 29.15 and a complete waiver of any claims that could be raised in a motion filed pursuant to this Rule 29.15." Rule 29.15 (1) further provides, "The circuit court shall not entertain successive motions." The Court finds that this motion is out of time and is a prohibited successive motion. THEREFORE, the Court orders, adjudges and decrees that the Motion made pursuant to Supreme COurt Rule 29.15 in this cause is DISMISSED. (see memo) SO ORDERED: JUDGE JOSEPH P. WHYTE #38194
- Entry of Appearance Filed State Entry of Appearance PCR. Filed By: EUSEF ROBIN HUQ
- Ord Allow In Forma Pauperis
- Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed
- Motion to Set Aside Post Conviction Relief motion under Supreme Court Rule 24.035 filed. RELATING CRIMINAL CASE 22031-00035-01
- Petition Filed - No Fees
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In
