Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-11
Status Reopened
Type Civil District Court (3 Pa)|Debt Collection
Docket 27 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Davis, Chuck
Defendant Ashcraft, Dustin
Photo of Hon. Mc Kay, Patrick J

Judge

Hon. Mc Kay, Patrick J

North Slope Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Notice of Hearing
  2. Complaint for Debt Collection Receipt: 2226373 Date: 10/11/2024
  3. Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
  4. Return of Service - Summons Served On: 1.05.2025 Dustin Ashcraft (Defendant);
  5. Attorney Information Attorney Ainsworth Jr, B Neal representing Defendant Ashcraft, Dustin as of 01/16/2025
  6. Answer to Complaint B Neal Ainsworth Jr (Attorney) on behalf of Dustin Ashcraft (Defendant)
  7. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: Limited Entry of Appearance TO: B NEAL AINSWORTH JR The following documents are being returned to you. Limited Entry of Appearance ACTION NEEDED TO CORRECT FILING You have recently submitted documents related to the above case. These documents are either incomplete or do not follow correct procedures. Please do the following: You have not proved all the required information in your Limited Entry of Appearance. Pursuant to Civil Rule 81(d)(2) The entry of appearance identifies the limitation by date, time period, or subject matter. Civil Deficiency Memo (11/23) Sent on: 01/22/2025 11:22:23.18
  8. Notice of Pretrial Scheduling Conference Civil Pretrial Conference Order (Palmer) (11/13) Sent on: 01/22/2025 11:37:29.75
  9. Memorandum to Set Civil Case for Trial Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Davis, Chuck Case Motion #1
  10. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: TO: CHUCK DAVIS RE: Memorandum to Set Civil Case for Trial ACTION NEEDED TO CORRECT FILING You have recently submitted documents related to the above case. These documents are either incomplete or do not follow correct procedures. Please do the following: You did not sign the Certificate of Service showing that you served the other side. You must give the other side in the case copies of every document you file in court. This is called service. Fill out and sign the certificate of service section at the end of the form or file a separate certificate of service form that includes: the documents served, who you served, when you did service, and how you provided copies to the other side in the case. You can use Certificate of Service (form TF-700), available at ak-courts.info/tf700. Serve by first-class mail or hand-delivery unless otherwise ordered by the court. Or, if the other side agreed to service by fax or email by checking that option in any filing (or by filing a separate notice of consent), then you can serve by that method instead. Civil Rules 5(f) and 5.1(c)(3). There is a Pre-Trial Scheduling Confrence already scheduled for 3/17/2025. Civil Deficiency Memo (11/23) Sent on: 02/06/2025 11:05:20.35
  11. Motion Deemed Moot Case Motion #1 Memorandum to Set Civil Case for Trial
  12. Report of Parties' Planning Meeting B Neal Ainsworth Jr (Attorney) on behalf of Dustin Ashcraft (Defendant)
  13. Calendaring Notice
  14. Administrative Reassignment from Judge Not Assigned 3PA03 to Judge Patrick J. McKay Jr.
  15. Log Notes: CR16 Pre-Trial Scheduling Conference
  16. Initial Pretrial Order Issued Pretrial Order
  17. Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii) (Part 1 of 3) Attorney: Ainsworth Jr, B Neal (1609073) Filing Party: Ashcraft, Dustin Case Motion #2
  18. Motion for Summary Judgment (Memorandum) (Part 2 of 3) Attorney: Ainsworth Jr, B Neal (1609073) Case Motion #2: Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii) (Part 1 of 3)
  19. Motion for Summary Judgment (Exhibits) (Part 3 of 3) Attorney: Ainsworth Jr, B Neal (1609073) Case Motion #2: Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii) (Part 1 of 3)
  20. PROOF OF SERVICE
  21. Log Notes- Calendar 2 Days CR16 Pre-Trial Conference
  22. Notice of Hearing
  23. Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment Chuck Davis (Plaintiff); Case Motion #2: Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii) (Part 1 of 3)
  24. Certificate of Service (linked to motion) Chuck Davis (Plaintiff); Case Motion #2: Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii) (Part 1 of 3)
  25. Notice of Intent to Rule Case Motion #2: Motion for Summary Judgment - Civil Rule 77(c)(ii) (Part 1 of 3)
  26. Log Notes: Trial Status
  27. Notice of Hearing

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more