Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-11-13
Status Closed
Type Divorce Without Children (4 Fa)|Spouses Without Minor Children (not Pregnant) Do Not Agree On All Issues To End Marriage
Docket 43 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Rice, Priscilla L
Defendant Rice, Stephen Keith
Photo of Hon. Peterson Earl A

Judge

Hon. Peterson Earl A

Anchorage Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Order Granting Motion Case Motion #7 [Proposed] Retirement Benefits Court Order
  2. Complaint for Divorce (No Children) Receipt: 2241633 Date: 11/14/2024
  3. Domestic Relations Procedural Order and Assignment
  4. Information Sheet - Confidential Document per Civil Rule 90.1(f)(1)
  5. Entry of Appearance Jason Morgan Owens (Attorney) on behalf of Priscilla L Rice (Plaintiff)
  6. Attorney Information
  7. LODGED: VS-401 Certificate of Absolute Divorce or Dissolution
  8. Summons Issued Stephen Keith Rice (Defendant);
  9. Amended Complaint for Divorce Jason Morgan Owens (Attorney) on behalf of Priscilla L Rice (Plaintiff)
  10. Answer and Counterclaim to Divorce Without Children Stephen Keith Rice (Defendant);
  11. Property and Debt Worksheet Stephen Keith Rice (Defendant);
  12. Motion, Affidavit, & Order to Appear & Testify by Telephone Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Rice, Stephen Keith Case Motion #1
  13. Motion for a Settlement Conference Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Rice, Stephen Keith Case Motion #2
  14. Order Granting Motion Case Motion #1 Motion, Affidavit, & Order to Appear & Testify by Telephone
  15. Reply to Answer and Counterclaim to Complaint for Divorce Jason Morgan Owens (Attorney) on behalf of Priscilla L Rice (Plaintiff)
  16. Motion for Request / Order to Disclose Property and Financial Information Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Rice, Stephen Keith Case Motion #3
  17. Motion for Request / Order Property amd Debt Settlement be Based on Date of Separation Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Rice, Stephen Keith Case Motion #4
  18. Civil Deficiency Memo to: Jason M Owens The following documents are being returned to you: - 12/13/24 Partial Opposition to Motion for a Settlement Conference The above document is missing your signature. To be accepted for filing, all documents must be signed. Civil Rules 11 and 76. Pursuant to the Amended Second Updated Presiding Judges' Statewide Administrative Order, litigants are authorized to sign documents that are e-filed by typing s/[name]/ on the signature line.
  19. Civil Deficiency Memo to: Jason M Owens The following documents are being returned to you: - 12/30/2024 Partial Opposition to Motion for a Settlement Conference - Pursuant to Civil Rule 77(c)(2), the time frame for filing an opposition is 10 days (plus 3 days if the motion was mailed to you) after the service date of the motion. Your opposition was due on 12/20/2024. You filed the opposition 10 days after the due date (unaccompanied by a motion requesting acceptance of your late-filed document). As such, it is being rejected for filing. To ask the court to accept your opposition, you may refile with a motion and proposed order requesting acceptance of your late-filed document. - Additionally, you did not submit a proposed order with your opposition. Pursuant to Civil Rule 77(c)(1)(iii), a proposed order must be included with the filing of an opposition.
  20. Order Granting Motion Rice, Stephen Keith Case Motion #2 Motion for a Settlement Conference
  21. Property and Debt Worksheet Stephen Keith Rice (Defendant);
  22. Motion to Enforce Injunction Attorney: Owens, Jason Morgan (2302005) Filing Party: Rice, Priscilla L Case Motion #5
  23. Opposition to Motion for to Enforce Junction Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Case Motion #5: Motion to Enforce Injunction
  24. Reply to Oppoaition to Motion to Enforce Injunction Attorney: Owens, Jason Morgan (2302005) Case Motion #5: Motion to Enforce Injunction
  25. Settlement Brief by Defendant Stephen Keith Rice (Defendant);
  26. Property and Debt Worksheet Stephen Keith Rice (Defendant);
  27. Civil Deficiency Memo to: Jason Morgan Owens The following documents are being returned to you: - 2/20/2025 Motion to Strike Your motion is requesting the court strike the defendant's Reply to Reply to Opposition to Motion to Enforce Injunction; however, the 'Reply to Reply' at issue was rejected for filing on 2/19/2025. A copy of the rejected document (with the TrueFiling Rejection Reason) is attached for your convenience. As such, your Motion to Strike is being returned to you. Civil Rule 77.
  28. Order of Referral to Standing Master
  29. Motion to Continue Settlement Conference Attorney: Owens, Jason Morgan (2302005) Filing Party: Rice, Priscilla L Case Motion #6
  30. Opposition to Motion to Continue Settlement Conference Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Case Motion #6: Motion to Continue Settlement Conference
  31. Motion Deemed Moot Rice, Stephen Keith Case Motion #3 Motion for Request / Order to Disclose Property and Financial Information
  32. Motion Deemed Moot Rice, Stephen Keith Case Motion #4 Motion for Request / Order Property amd Debt Settlement be Based on Date of Separation
  33. Motion Deemed Moot Rice, Priscilla L Case Motion #5 Motion to Enforce Injunction
  34. Motion Deemed Moot Rice, Priscilla L Case Motion #6 Motion to Continue Settlement Conference
  35. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
  36. Settlement Agreement
  37. Divorce Decree Granted
  38. Divorce Granted After Contested Hearing
  39. PROCESSED: VS-401 Certificate of Absolute Divorce or Dissolution
  40. [Proposed] Retirement Benefits Court Order Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Rice, Stephen Keith Case Motion #7
  41. [Proposed] Military Retired Pay Division Order Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Rice, Stephen Keith Case Motion #8
  42. PROOF OF SERVICE
  43. CONFIDENTIAL Order Granting Motion Case Motion #8 [Proposed] Military Retired Pay Division Order

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more