Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Pinellas County

Court

Pinellas County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-12-13
Status CLOSED
Type Auto Negligence Circuit
Docket 59 entries
Disposition voluntary dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Emily Fuks|State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant Charles Gelini|State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Photo of Hon. JIROTKA, GEORGE M

Judge

Hon. JIROTKA, GEORGE M

Pinellas County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. IVIL COVER SHEET - E-FILED Amount: 100001.00
  2. IVIL - CASE DISMISSED BEFORE HEARING - SETTLEMENT
  3. OTICE
  4. OTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
  5. OTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
  6. TANDING ORDER ASSIGNING GENERAL CIVIL CASE TRACK
  7. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  8. RDER
  9. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  10. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  11. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  12. BJECTION
  13. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  14. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  15. OTICE
  16. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  17. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  18. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  19. ERTIFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION
  20. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  21. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  22. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  23. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  24. BJECTION
  25. BJECTION
  26. ERTIFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION
  27. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  28. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  29. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  30. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  31. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  32. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  33. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  34. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  35. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  36. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  37. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  38. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  39. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  40. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  41. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,
  42. EQUEST
  43. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,
  44. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  45. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  46. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  47. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  48. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: GELINI, CHARLES
  49. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: GELINI, CHARLES
  50. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: GELINI, CHARLES
  51. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,
  52. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  53. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  54. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  55. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  56. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  57. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,
  58. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: GELINI, CHARLES
  59. OMPLAINT WITH DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more