Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Washtenaw Co

Court

Washtenaw Co

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-22
Type No Fault Automobile Insurance (nf)
Docket 82 entries
Disposition settlement

Parties

Plaintiff Rollins, Jr., Charles
Defendant Allstate Insurance Company
Photo of Hon. Kuhnke, Carol

Judge

Hon. Kuhnke, Carol

Washtenaw County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Kuhnke, Carol) Cancel Adj. 7/21 05/12/2025 Reset by Court to 07/21/2025 07/21/2025 Reset by Court to 11/17/2025
  2. ummons Issued (Summons and Complaint)
  3. ummons Allstate Insurance Company Served 05/13/2024
  4. omplaint
  5. xhibit List Preliminary / proof of service
  6. ocument Initial disclosures / proof of service
  7. equest To admit, interrogatories and to produce to defendant allstate insurance company / proof of service
  8. itness List Preliminary / proof of service
  9. roof of Service - Summons and Complaint (by mail)
  10. ury Demand
  11. nswer to Complaint And affirmative defenses/ proof of service
  12. roof of Service
  13. cheduling Order (sgd 6/18/24)
  14. itness - Exhibit List & proof of service
  15. roof of Service
  16. roof of Service
  17. nswer To plaintiff's request for admisssions / proof of service
  18. roof of Service
  19. tipulated Order For substitution of attorneys for defendant allstate insurance company (sgd 8/9/24)
  20. otice of Taking Deposition Of charles rollins via zoom video conferencing & proof of service
  21. roof of Service
  22. e-Notice Of taking deposition of plaintiff via zoom video conferencing/ proof of service
  23. roof of Service
  24. roof of Service
  25. rder First adj. of dates by 60 days (sgd. 12/23/2024)
  26. otice of Taking Deposition Continued of plaintiff via zoom video conferencing/ proof of service
  27. roof of Service
  28. xhibit List 1st amended & proof of service
  29. itness List 1st amended & proof of service
  30. roof of Service
  31. roof of Service
  32. otice Re: change of firm for defendant allstate insurance company & proof of service
  33. roof of Service
  34. roof of Service
  35. tipulated Order To adjourn scheduling order dates (sgd 5/13/25)
  36. roof of Service
  37. roof of Service
  38. tipulated Order To adjourn settlement conference (sgd 10/6/25)
  39. ettlement Conference (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Kuhnke, Carol) Adj. 3/27, 6/5,10/2 03/27/2025 Reset by Court to 06/05/2025 06/05/2025 Reset by Court to 10/02/2025 10/02/2025 Reset by Court to 10/16/2025 Result: Held
  40. otion In limine to preclude evidence not produced during course of discovery with brief in support & proof of service
  41. otion In limine to preclude testimony regarding claims handling, compensation and bonus structures with brief in support & proof of service
  42. roof of Service
  43. otion In limine to sequester plaintiff's trial witnesses with brief in support & proof of service
  44. otion In limine to exclude use of public good arguments and the reptile theory with brief in support & proof of service
  45. otion In limine to preclude testimony and discussions about defendant's "wealth" with brief in support & proof of service
  46. oom Notice of Motion Hearing Scheduled
  47. oom Notice of Motion Hearing Scheduled
  48. oom Notice of Motion Hearing Scheduled
  49. oom Notice of Motion Hearing Scheduled
  50. oom Notice of Motion Hearing Scheduled
  51. otion In limine to use charts in opening/ closing statements/ proof of service
  52. otion In limine to preclude dme reports at trial/ proof of service
  53. otion In limine to preclude defendant from arguing that pre-existing conditions preclude the payment of no fault benefits/ proof of service
  54. rief In support of his motion in limine to allow examination of defendant's adjuster as a hostile witness/ proof of service
  55. roof of Service
  56. otion In limine to allow examination of defendant's adjuster as a hostile witness/ proof of service
  57. roof of Service
  58. otion For equitable apportionment/ brief in support/ proof of service
  59. roof of Service
  60. roof of Service
  61. rief In support of his response to defendant's motion in limine to preclude "reptile theory" arguments/ proof of service
  62. esponse To defendant's motion in limine to preclude testimony regarding claims handling, compensation, and bonus structures/ proof of service
  63. esponse To defendant's motion in limine to sequester plaintiff's witnesses from video testimony of defendant's witnesses/ proof of service
  64. rief In support of his response to defendant's motion in limine to preclude evidence not produced during the course of discovery/ proof of service
  65. esponse To defendant's motion in limine to preclude "reptile theory" arguments/ proof of service
  66. rief In support of his response to defendant's motion in limine to sequester plaintiff's witnesses from video testimony of defendant's witnesses/ proof of service
  67. rief In support of response to defendant's motion in limine to preclude testimony regarding claims handling, compensation, and bonus structures/ proof of service
  68. oom Notice of Motion Hearing Scheduled
  69. oom Notice of Motion Hearing Scheduled
  70. oom Notice of Motion Hearing Scheduled
  71. oom Notice of Motion Hearing Scheduled
  72. oom Notice of Motion Hearing Scheduled
  73. esponse In opposition to defendant's motion in limine to preclude evidence not produced during the course of discovery/ proof of service
  74. oncurrence With plaintiff's motion in limine to preclude dme reports at trial/ proof of service
  75. roof of Service
  76. oncurrence With plaintiff's motion in limine to use charts in opening/ closing statements/ proof of service
  77. esponse To plaintiff's motion in limine to preclude defendant from arguing that pre-existing conditions preclude the poayment of no-fault benefits/ brief in support/ proof of service
  78. oncurrence With plaintiff's motion in limine to allow examination of defendant's adjuster as a hostile witness/ proof of service
  79. otion Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Kuhnke, Carol) deft mtn to approve under mcl 500.3112 - placeholder set at 10/16 SC; MIL #1 Preclude Testimony and Discussions about Deft's "Wealth"; MIL #2 Preclude Testimony Regarding claims Handling, Compensation and Bonus Structures;MIL #3 Preclude Evidence from Pltf Not Produced During Discovery; MIL #4 Eclude Use of Public Good Argument and the Reptire Theory; MIL #5 Sequester Pltfs Trial Witnesses; Pltf/ (1)MIL to Use Charts in Opining/Closing Statements;(2) Allow Examination of Deft Adjuster as a Hostile Witness; (3) MIL to Preclude Deft from Arguing that Pre-Existing Conditions Preclude the Payment of No Fault Benefits; (4) MIL to preclude DME Reports at Trial Result: Held
  80. otion Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Kuhnke, Carol) ZOOM-Deft/ Motion for Equitable Apportionment Result: Held
  81. roof of Service
  82. rder Granting deft. motion for equitable appointment (sgd. 11/14/2025)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more