Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-11-05
Status Pending
Type 42 Cv Other Complaint Civil Unlimited
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Villarino, David
Defendant Farmworkers Institute Of Education And Leadership Development|Cross villarino, David
Photo of Hon. Pulskamp Gregory

Judge

Hon. Pulskamp Gregory

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Civil Case Cover Sheet has incorrect court address and #4 needs to be filled out. Submitted document is not the current/updated form of the Civil Case Cover Sheet form CM-010. Please access the California Courts website (www.courts.ca.gov) and use the CURRENT version of the CM-010. Summons section, 'Notice to the Person Served', must be left blank/un-selected when initially filing. Please correct and re-file into the existing case. Summons has incorrect court address and does not conform exact to Complaint. Please review Party information. Please remove date under attorney information. Please use the correct address of the Civil Division: at 1215 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301.
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 12/18/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: J
  3. Served 09/17/20242:01 PM
  4. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET: Missing signature
  5. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  6. Comment as to Farmworkers Institute of Education and Leadership Development, by substituted service
  7. Comment Plaintiff Ex-Parte for Temporary Restraining Order & Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction
  8. Comment of Ian A. King II in Support of Plaintiff's Notice and Ex-Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction
  9. Comment Declaration of Ines DeLuna
  10. Comment Declaration of Nora Dominquez
  11. View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Pre-Disposition 10/17/2024 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Filed 10/16/2024 Plaintiff Ex-Parte for Temporary Restraining Order & Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction
  12. Comment Reply to Defendants Opposition to Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction
  13. Comment Declaration of Ian A. King, II in support of Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants Opposition to Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction
  14. Comment Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice in Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction
  15. View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Pre-Disposition 10/17/2024 View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Post-Disposition 10/23/2024 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment plaintiff ex parte for TRO and OSC re: Preliminary Injunction continued from 10/17/2024
  16. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Comment court reporter: Lena Mescall license no.: 13018
  17. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Missing required proof of service. Cross-Complaint - All Cross-Actions are to be listed, please review CRC 2.111(4) and resubmit.
  18. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Title underneath case number reflects "Amended Answer," there is not an answer on file to amend. Cross Complaint - All Cross Complainants are to be listed, unable to list DOES as a Cross Complaintant.
  19. Comment **Amended**
  20. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 11/05/2024
  21. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Caption box does not conform to the Cross-Complaint. Review/correct DOES information listed as Cross-Complainant.
  22. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  23. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more