Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-21
Status Pending
Type 22 Cv Auto Civil Unlimited
Docket 37 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Osborne, Taylor Mariee
Defendant Badgett, Allen|Badgett, Rebecca|Turner, Marrianne Christine|Uber Technologies, Inc.|Badgett, John Thomas|Cross roes 1 To 25|Cross badgett, John Thomas, Jr.|Cross badgett, Rebecca
Photo of Hon. Barmann Bernard C Jr

Judge

Hon. Barmann Bernard C Jr

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 10/11/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: H
  2. Served 07/20/202410:58 AM Served 07/20/202410:58 AM Served 07/18/20248:06 PM Served 07/17/202412:36 PM
  3. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Defendant name does not conform to Complaint. Filer has been contacted.
  4. Comment as to Allen Badgett via sub service
  5. Comment as to Rebecca Badgett via personal service
  6. Comment as to Marrianne Christine Turner via personal service
  7. Comment as to Uber Technologies, Inc. via personal service
  8. Unserved Unserved Unserved Unserved
  9. Comment DOE 1: John Thomas Badgett
  10. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Second Amended Complaint- No order permitting the filing of a second amended complaint. See CCP 472.
  11. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Rejected per filers request 8/19/24.
  12. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Caption box of the Answer and Cross-Complaint do not conform to the First Amended Complaint filed 7/23/24. Summons does not conform exact to the Cross-Complaint, please review DOES. Please review/correct and resubmit.
  13. Comment of Allen Badgett and Rebecca Badgett
  14. Comment of Marrianne Christine Turner
  15. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 08/21/2024
  16. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 08/21/2024
  17. Comment of Marrianne Christine Turner
  18. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Review CRC 2.111 (4). All cross actions are not listed.
  19. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service x2
  20. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Caption box on both documents does not conform to the First Amended Complaint. Cross-Complaint: Review/correct "and" verbiage in the title underneath the case number.
  21. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - All cross actions are not listed. Review CRC 2.111. Title is unclear. Review/correct and re-submit. Cross complaint- All cross actions are not listed. Review CRC 2.111
  22. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Title underneath case number is unclear. Caption does not conform exact to the first amended complaint. Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint. Cross-Complaint - Caption does not conform exact to first amended complaint. Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint.
  23. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Caption box does not conform to first amended complaint, review/correct party listed as "Uber Technologies". Review/correct "ad" verbiage in the title underneath the case number.
  24. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Caption box does not conform to Cross-Complaint. Correct the "ad" verbiage in the title underneath the case number. Party listed as "John Thomas Badgett" in the upper left header underneath attorney information does not reflect "Jr." as listed in the title and in the first paragraph.
  25. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 10/11/2024 Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  26. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment 1. Caption box does not conform to Cross-Complaint. 2. Correct the "ad" verbiage in the title underneath the case number. Review & correct prior to resubmitting.
  27. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer to Cross-Complaint - Caption box does not conform to the Cross-Complaint. Review/correct cross defendants listed prior to resubmitting.
  28. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  29. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Continued from 10/11/2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more