Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-29
Status Dismissed
Type 36 Unlimited Wrongful Termination
Docket 63 entries
Disposition settlement

Parties

Plaintiff Garrison, Brian
Defendant Convergint Technologies, Llc|View Document 04/24/2024 S Answer To Complaint|View Document 04/24/2024 S Answer To Complaint
Photo of Hon. Skiles Jon M

Judge

Hon. Skiles Jon M

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  23. Comment Parties to engage in mediation. Mediator: TBD
  24. Case Management Statement Filed
  25. View Document Case Management Conference
  26. Comment HRG:
  27. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  28. View Document Notice of Remote Appearance
  29. Comment Party: Attorney Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  30. Proof of Service
  31. View Document Proof of Service
  32. Comment by Email - - Notice and Order for Remote Appearance
  33. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  34. View Document Proposed Order Regarding Remote Appearance
  35. View Document Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  36. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  37. Comment Party: Attorney Type of Appearance Requested: CourtCall
  38. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  39. Comment Emailed to: [email protected]; [email protected]
  40. Case Management Conference
  41. Original Type Case Management Conference
  42. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  43. Hearing Time 3:00 PM
  44. Result Heard
  45. Minute Order Attachment
  46. View Document - Minute Order Attachment w/ CM
  47. Remote Appearance Via Courtcall
  48. Comment Special Appearance J. Migliazzo for N. Austin
  49. Jury Requested by Party
  50. Comment Time Estimate: 7 Days
  51. Referral to ADR
  52. Request for Dismissal Received - Pending Review
  53. View Document Request for Dismissal
  54. Mandatory Settlement Conference
  55. Hearing Time 10:00 AM
  56. Cancel Reason Dismissed
  57. Trial Readiness
  58. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  59. Hearing Time 9:30 AM
  60. Cancel Reason Dismissed
  61. Jury Trial
  62. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  63. Hearing Time 9:00 AM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more