Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-11-12
Status Open
Type E Filed Ota Other
Docket 85 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Britton, Randy A
Defendant Luangrath, Derek|Luangrath, Jane|Luangrath, Jordan|Luangrath, Ounkham

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. The Court has received Mr. Britton's second motion for an extension of time to respond to Defendants' motion to stay this case. The Court DENIES the motion for a second extension and GRANTS Defendants' motion to stay this proceeding pending Mr. Britton's appeal of the judgment in Essex Superior Court Case No. 2077CV01191. This order is without prejudice to any party's right to move for good cause shown to reopen this case, either before or after conclusion of the appeal. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Defendant: Frank P Muzio, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Michael R Tilden, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Jennifer C Warry, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Sent On: 10/27/2025 10:19:21
  2. Land Court surcharge Receipt: 455960 Date: 11/13/2024 Reverse Receipt: 455960 Date: 11/13/2024 Reverse by: 456232 Receipt Reversal Reason: Refund Reverse Amount: 15.00 Reverse Comments: Fee Waived - Indigency. Filer did not correctly select the waiver option when filing this case in Tyler [Friday, November 15, 2024 10:15 AM] Dismissed Type: Indigency Dismissed Date: 11/22/2024 Dismissed Amount: 15.00 Dismissing Clerk / Judge: Patterson, Deborah J. Comments: Fee Waived - Indigency. Filer did not correctly select the "Waiver" option via Tyler [Friday, November 15, 2024 10:15 AM] Dismissed By: SHEGARTY
  3. Case assigned to the Average Track per Land Court Standing Order 1:04.
  4. Complaint eFiled.
  5. Uniform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
  6. Affidavit of Indigency, filed.
  7. Land Court summons Dismissed Type: Waived Dismissed Date: 11/13/2024 Dismissed Amount: 20.00 Dismissing Clerk / Judge: Kelley, Ellen M. Comments: Affidavit of Indigency Dismissed By: SANFORD
  8. Financial Notes: Fee Waiver Auth
  9. The case has been assigned to the A Track. Notice sent.
  10. Event Scheduled Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Event: Case Management Conference Date: 12/12/2024 Time: 09:30 AM
  11. Request for Stay, filed.
  12. Memorandum of Authorities, filed.
  13. The Court has reviewed, and DENIES, defendant Derek and Jordan Luangrath's "Motion to Stay Pending Appeal." The motion asks the Court to "Stay . . . This Court's Order dated 11-13-2024 pending appellate review of that Order." The Court did not issue any "order" on November 13, 2024. The Court did issue to plaintiff Randy A. Britton court four summonses, one for each of the defendants in this case. The Court is unaware of any rule that permits a defendant to "appeal" a trial court's issuance of a summons. The thrust of the Luangraths' motion is that the Essex Probate and Family Court has already decided the issues plaintiff Britton has raised in this case. If that's so, the Court will give the Luangraths a full opportunity to present that argument to this Court once they've answered Britton's complaint; but merely alleging that the Essex court has decided these issues already doesn't give the Luangraths the right to obtain a stay of their obligation under the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure to respond to this Court's summons. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath 81 Odell Ave, Beverly, MA 01915 Defendant: Jane Luangrath 60 Rantoul St, Beverley, MA 01915 Defendant: Jordan Luangrath 1873 Everhart Drive, Orlando, FL 32806 Defendant: Ounkham Luangrath No addresses available Sent On: 11/26/2024 08:24:28 Notice of Docket Entry sent to Derek Luangrath by email from the Sessions Clerk.
  14. Email Certificate of Service, filed.
  15. Derek Luangrath agrees to receive notices by email, filed.
  16. Jordan Luangrath agrees to receive all notices by email, filed.
  17. Answer and Counterclaim filed by Derek Luangrath, and Jordan Luangrath.
  18. Exhibits filed.
  19. Randy Britton's Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims of Derek Luangrath and Jordan Lunagrath, filed.
  20. The Court has received Mr. Britton's motion to dismiss Derek and Jordan Luangrath's counterclaims. The Court will discuss with the parties at upcoming case-management conference a schedule for the Luangraths to oppose the motion; the Court will take no action on the motion before then. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 12/04/2024 16:07:17 Notice of Docket Entry sent to Pro Se by email from the Sessions Clerk.
  21. Case Management Conference Joint Statement, filed.
  22. Jane E. Luangrath's Reply to Randy Britton's Complaint to Set Aside a Fraudulent Conveyance, Counterclaim and Motion to Remove Randy Britton's $250,000 Lien Plus Interest and .25% Conveyance by Deed, filed.
  23. Certificate of Service, filed.
  24. The Court has received Ms. Luangrath's Reply and Motion to Remove Lien. Since Ms. Luangrath is representing herself, the Court deems the "Reply" as Ms. Luangrath's answer to Mr. Britton's complaint and her "Motion" as a counterclaim. The Court ORDERS Mr. Britton to file a responsive pleading or motion in accordance with the content and timing requirements of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Ounkham Luangrath No addresses available Sent On: 12/09/2024 11:48:11 Notice of Docket Entry sent to Pro Se by email from the Sessions Clerk.
  25. Appearance of Laurence Michael Kelley, Esq. for Ounkham Luangrath, filed
  26. Event Resulted: Case Management Conference scheduled on: 12/12/2024 09:30 AM Has been: Held via telephone Hon. Michael D. Vhay, Presiding
  27. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Early Intervention Event held. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D.
  28. Case management conference and initial intervention event held by telephone. Defendant Ounkham Luangrath appeared through counsel. The remaining parties appeared representing themselves. (Since many of the parties share the same last name, this order will refer to such parties by their first names.) Randy alleges he and Jane previously co-owned property at 81 Odell Ave in Beverly, MA. Randy claims Jane fraudulently conveyed her interest in the property to her sons Derek and Jordan; Randy wants that conveyance undone. Randy admitted that he hasn't brought claims against Ounkham at the moment; without opposition from Ounkham, the Court DISMISSES Ounkham as a party to this case without prejudice to any claims Randy may have against him. (The Court DENIES Ounkham's motion to make that dismissal with prejuduce.) Jane, Derek, and Jordan have counterclaimed against Randy; they seek declarations that his claimed 0.25% interest in the property and a claimed mortgage on the property are invalid. (The Court ORDERS Dereke and Jordan to file by December 19, 2024, a fully signed copy of their answer and counterclaims.) Randy has moved to dismiss Derek and Jordan's counterclaims but hasn't yet moved to dismiss Jane's counterclaim; the Court ORDERS Randy to file by December 26, 2024, that motion. The Court further ORDERS Jane, Derek, and Jordan to file by January 9, 2025, any oppositions to Randy's motions to dismiss their counterclaims. The Court ORDERS the parties (which no longer include Ounkham) to appear on January 14, 2025, at 2:00 PM, for a hearing by Zoom on Randy's motions. A separate notice of hearing will issue. The Court STAYS all discovery in this case until further order of the Court. Jordan agreed to receive notices from the Court, and service from the other parties, by electronic mail. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Defendant: Laurence Michael Kelley, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 12/12/2024 14:35:02 Notice of Docket Entry sent to Counsel of record and Pro Se by email from the Sessions Clerk.
  29. Scheduled Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Event: Hearing Date: 01/14/2025 Time: 02:00 PM
  30. Answer and Counterclaim filed by Derek Luangrath.
  31. Randy Britton's Motion for an extension of time, filed.
  32. The Court has received, and GRANTS in part, Mr. Britton's motion for an extension of time. The Court GRANTS Mr. Britton leave to file by January 2, 2025, his motion to dismiss Jane Luangrath's counterclaims. The Court GRANTS defendants leave to file by January 16, 2025, any opposition to Mr. Britton's motions to dismiss defendants' counterclaims. The Court CANCELS the January 14, 2025, hearing on the parties' motions. The Court will reschedule the hearing, if one is needed, after the Court has received the parties' briefs. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 12/27/2024 17:02:06 Notice of Docket Entry sent to parties by email from the Sessions Clerk.
  33. Event Resulted: Hearing scheduled on: 01/14/2025 02:00 PM Has been: Canceled Hon. Michael D. Vhay, Presiding
  34. Randy Britton's Motion for Judgment on the Pleandings against all Defendants, filed.
  35. Randy Britton's Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims of Jane Luangrath, filed.
  36. The Court has received Mr. Britton's motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court ORDERS defendants to file by January 17, 2025, any opposition to the motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court also has received Mr. Britton's motion to dismiss Ms. Luangrath's counterclaims; the Court REMINDS defendants that their oppositions to both of Mr. Britton's motions to dismiss defendants' counterclaims currently are due January 16, 2025. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 01/03/2025 10:24:50
  37. Jane E. Luangrath's Reply to Randy Britton's Complaint to set aside a fraudelent Conveyance, Counterclaim and Motion to Remove Randy Britton's 250,000 Lien plus Interest and .25% conveyance by Deed, filed.
  38. Exhibit (to Jane E. Luangrath's Reply to Randy Britton's Complaint to set aside a fraudulent Conveyance, Counterclaim and Motion to Remove Randy Britton's 250,000 Lien plus Interest and .25% conveyance by Deed), filed.
  39. Memorandum in Opposition to Randy Britton's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings against all Defendants, filed.
  40. Motion to Oppose the Motion to Dismiss the Couterclaims, filed.
  41. Randy Britton's Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims, filed.
  42. Scheduled Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Event: Hearing Date: 02/10/2025 Time: 03:00 PM
  43. Event Resulted: Hearing scheduled on: 02/10/2025 03:00 PM Has been: Held via video Hon. Michael D. Vhay, Presiding
  44. Hearing held by videoconference on Mr. Britton's (1) motion to dismiss the counterclaims of Jane Luangrath, (2) motion to dismiss the counterclaims of Jordan and Derek Luangrath, and (3) motion for judgment on the pleadings against all defendants. Mr. Britton appeared representing himself. Defendants Jane, Derek, and Jordan Luangrath appeared representing themselves. (Since the Defendants share the same last name, this order will refer to each by their first names.) After hearing from the parties and for the reasons stated on the record, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Mr. Britton's motion to dismiss Jane's counterclaims. The Court DISMISSES Jane's counterclaim pertaining to Mr. Britton's alleged unauthorized practice of law for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Court DISMISSES Jane's claim of coercion for failing to state a claim; the facts she alleges in her counterclaims do not state a claim of coercion. The Court DENIES Mr. Britton's motion to dismiss Jane's counterclaims of undue influence and fraud. After hearing from the parties and for the reasons stated on the record, the Court DENIES Mr. Britton's motion to dismiss Jordan and Derek's counterclaims, as they have stated claims that the original conveyance from Jane to Mr. Britton and her grant to him of a mortgage in her interest in her home are (1) void for lack of performance of his contractual obligations to Jane and (b) void on account of a prior judgment of the Essex Probate and Family Court. The Court DENIES Mr. Britton's motion for judgment on the pleadings against all defendants since each defendant has at least one valid defense. The Court ORDERS the parties to complete all discovery (both fact and expert) by April 18, 2025. The Court further ORDERS the parties to appear on April 28, 2025, at 10:00 AM, for a status conference by Zoom. A separate notice of status conference will issue. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Defendant: Laurence Michael Kelley, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 02/11/2025 07:46:50 Notice of Docket Entry sent to all parties by email from the Sessions Clerk.
  45. Scheduled Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Event: Status Conference Date: 04/28/2025 Time: 10:00 AM
  46. Randy Britton's Motion to Reconsider the Court's February 11, 2025 Order, filed.
  47. The Court has reviewed, and DENIES, Mr. Britton's motion for reconsideration. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Defendant: Laurence Michael Kelley, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 02/24/2025 10:57:18 Notice of Docket Entry sent to all parties by email from the Sessions Clerk.
  48. Randy Britton's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Jane, Derek & Jordan Luangrath's Counterclaims, filed.
  49. Answer to Randy Britton Defenses and Discovery Documents, filed.
  50. On April 17, 2025, Derek and Jordan Luangrath filed an "Answer to Randy Brittons [sic] Defenses and Discovery Documents." With certain exceptions not relevant here, Rule 5(d)(2) of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure prohibits parties from filing discovery materials with the Court. To the extent the Luangraths' filing is to show what they or Mr. Britton provided in discovery, the Court DISREGARDS the "Answer." The "Answer" also includes a request that the Court "avoid the lien" Britton claims to hold on 81 Odell Avenue and declare that he has not other interest in the property. The Court will discuss with the parties at the April 28, 2025, the appropriate next steps in this case; the Court will thus take no action on the Luangraths' request at this time. For these reasons, the Court PROHIBITS the other parties from filling any response to the "Answer" without advance permission from the Court. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 04/22/2025 08:13:41 Notice of Docket Entry sent to all parties by email from the Sessions Clerk.
  51. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 04/28/2025 10:00 AM Has been: Held via video Hon. Michael D. Vhay, Presiding
  52. Status videoconference held. All parties appeared, each representing themselves. Mr. Britton claims that defendants have not responded to his discovery requests. With his agreement, the Court ORDERS Mr. Britton to file by May 9, 2025, any and all motions to compel discovery that's outstanding. The Court ADVISED the parties that Land Court Rules 7 and 8 apply to all such motions, and that Land Court Rule 7 requires the parties to confer in good faith in an effort to resolve any discovery disputes without the need of a motion to compel discovery. Defendants reported that they didn't serve any discovery requests on Mr. Britton. They also believe this case can be resolved on the papers, and without a trial. The Court postponed consideration of that issue until the Court has resolved all discovery disputes. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 04/28/2025 10:31:11
  53. Randy Britton's Motion for an Extension of Time (by One Week), filed and ALLOWED (Vhay, J.). Notice of Docket Entry sent to counsel of record by email.
  54. Randy Britton's Motion for an Extension of Time (for 5 days), filed and ALLOWED (Vhay, J.). Notice of Docket Entry sent to counsel of record by email.
  55. Motion for Protective Order, filed.
  56. The Court has reviewed, and DENIES without prejudice to its renewal, Defendants' motion for a protective order. Rule 26(c) of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure governs protective orders, but Land Court Rule 7 requires any party who files a motion under Rule 26 to "confer in advance of filing [the] motion . . . in a good faith effort to narrow areas of disagreement to the fullest possible extent. The party who intends to file the motion shall be responsible for initiating the conference. All such motions shall contain a certificate stating that the conference required by this rule was held, together with the date and time of the conference and the names of the participating parties." Defendants' motion for a protective order does not contain the required certificate. The Court will treat the motion as "renewed" if and when Defendants file the required certificate. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 05/21/2025 10:49:44 Notice of Docket Entry sent to all parties by email.
  57. Randy Britton's Motion for an Extension of Time (for 1 Day), filed.
  58. The Court has received, and GRANTS, Mr. Britton's motion for extension of time. The Court will grant no further extensions except for grave cause shown. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 05/22/2025 15:48:25 Notice of Docket Entry sent to all parties by email.
  59. Randy Britton's Motion to Compel Document Requests, filed.
  60. Randy Britton's Brief in Support of Motion to Compel Document Requests, filed.
  61. Randy Britton's Request for the Production of Documents to Jane, Derek and Jordan Lunagrath, filed.
  62. The Court has received Mr. Britton's motion to compel document requests, his brief in support of that motion, and a copy of the document request. The Sessions Clerk will docket those materials. The Court will not docket, however, an e-mail chain submitted by Mr. Britton showing the parties' communications over the motion (plus unrelated matters), as they are unnecessary for the Court to decide the motion. The Court ORDERS Defendants to file by June 6, 2025, any opposition to Mr. Britton's motion. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 05/23/2025 15:22:36 Notice of Docket Entry sent to all parties by email.
  63. Motion for Extension of Time to oppose Randy Britton's Motion to Compel, filed.
  64. The Court has received, and GRANTS, defendants' motion for extension of time to oppose Mr. Britton's motion to compel discovery. The Court ORDERS defendants (with or without counsel) to file their opposition by July 1, 2025. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Defendant: Derek Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jane Luangrath [email protected] Defendant: Jordan Luangrath [email protected] Sent On: 06/03/2025 11:09:28 Notice of Docket Entry sent to all parties by email.
  65. Appearance of Frank P Muzio, Esq., Michael R Tilden, Esq., Jennifer C Warry, Esq. for Derek Luangrath, Jane Luangrath, Jordan Luangrath, filed
  66. Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff Randy Britton's Motion to Compel Document Requests and Request for Attorney's Fees and Costs, filed.
  67. Certificate Under Land Court Rule 7, filed.
  68. The Court has received Defendants' Land Court Rule 7 certification pertaining to their May 19, 2025, motion for a protective order. The Court thus considers the motion renewed. The Court ORDERS Mr. Britton to file by July 15, 2025, any opposition to the motion. The Court ORDERS the parties to appear by videoconference on July 18, 2025, at 8:30 AM for a hearing on (a) Mr. Britton's motion to compel discovery and (b) Defendants' motion for a protective order. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Defendant: Frank P Muzio, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Michael R Tilden, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Jennifer C Warry, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Sent On: 07/02/2025 10:47:27 Notice of Docket Entry sent to all parties by email.
  69. Scheduled Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Event: Hearing Date: 07/18/2025 Time: 08:30 AM
  70. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6), (9) and ((b) and Memorandum of Law in Support, filed.
  71. Appendix to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuan to Mss. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6), (9) and ((b) (In Complinace with Land Court Rule 4), filed.
  72. The Court has received Defendants' motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Rule 16, Mass. R. Civ. P., the Court will take no action on the motion at this time. Defendants didn't file the motion within 20 days of being sued in this case; instead, they answered Mr. Britton's complaint and filed counterclaims. The Court then ordered the parties to undergo discovery. Discovery was to be completed by April 18, 2025. Notwithstanding the issues presented in Mr. Britton's motion to compel discovery and Defendants' cross-motion for a protective order, the Court expects discovery to be over this summer. Once discovery is over, the Court will confer with the parties over how best to resolve the claims and counterclaims in this case. Defendants may propose at that time having the Court consider their motion to dismiss. The Court EXCUSES Mr. Britton from filing an opposition to Defendants' motion until such time as the Court determines that action on the motion is appropriate. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Defendant: Frank P Muzio, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Michael R Tilden, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Jennifer C Warry, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Sent On: 07/02/2025 13:15:18 Notice of Docket Entry sent to all parties by email.
  73. Randy Britton's Motion for an Extension of Time (1-day extension), filed and ALLOWED (Vhay, J.). Notice of Docket Entry sent to counsel of record and Pro Se by email.
  74. Opposition, filed.
  75. Event Resulted: Hearing scheduled on: 07/18/2025 08:30 AM Has been: Held via video Hon. Michael D. Vhay, Presiding
  76. Hearing held by videoconference on Mr. Britton's motion to compel production of documents and Defendants' motion for a protective order. Mr. Britton appeared representing himself. Defendants appeared through counsel. After hearing from the parties, the Court GRANTS IN PART Mr. Britton's motion. The Court ORDERS (1) Jordan Luangrath to produce by August 8, 2025, all documents responsive to requests five and six; (2) all Defendants to produce by August 8, 2025, any property insurance policies sought in request seven as they pertain to 81 Odell Avenue; and (3) all Defendants to produce by August 8, 2025, all documents that are responsive to requests nine, ten, and eleven, without prejudice to the right of the non-party joint owner of the Jane Luangrath bank account to move before August 8, 2025, for a protective order. The Court otherwise DENIES Mr. Britton's motion and GRANTS Defendants' motion for a protective order with respect to the "denied" items in Mr. Britton's motion. The Court otherwise DENIES Defendant's motion for a protective order and request for attorney's fees and costs. During the hearing, Defendants moved for additional time to take discovery; for the reasons stated on the record, the Court DENIES the motion. The Court ORDERS the parties to appear on September 18, 2025, at 9:00 AM for a status videoconference. A separate notice of videoconference will issue. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Defendant: Frank P Muzio, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Michael R Tilden, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Jennifer C Warry, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Sent On: 07/18/2025 13:27:15
  77. Scheduled Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Event: Status Conference Date: 09/18/2025 Time: 09:00 AM
  78. Motion, filed.
  79. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 09/18/2025 09:00 AM Has been: Held via video Hon. Michael D. Vhay, Presiding
  80. Telephonic status conference held. Plaintiff Randy Britton appeared representing himself. Defendants Jane Luangrath, Jordan Luangrath, and Derek Luangrath appeared through counsel. After hearing from the parties, the Court ORDERS Mr. Britton to submit by October 17, 2025, any opposition to Defendants' motion to stay this case. The Court TEMPORARILY STAYS the case through receipt of the opposition. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Defendant: Frank P Muzio, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Michael R Tilden, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Jennifer C Warry, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Sent On: 09/19/2025 13:17:05 Notice of Docket Entry sent to the parties by email.
  81. Affidavit of Indigency, filed.
  82. Randy Britton's Motion for an Extension of Time, filed.
  83. The Court has reviewed, and GRANTS in part, Mr. Britton's motion for an extension of time to file his opposition to Defendants' motion for a stay. The motion doesn't explain why or how the doctrine of "res judicata" bears on Defendants' stay motion, and thus the Court sees no need for Mr. Britton to obtain tapes or transcripts from either the Essex Superior or this Court to oppose effectively Defendants' stay motion. (If events in this or the Superior Court proceeding are material to Defendants' stay motion, Mr. Britton can present those facts by affidavit; the Court doesn't require a transcript: the Court has easy access to the recordings of all proceedings.) The Court nevertheless EXTENDS to October 24, 2025, the deadline for Mr. Britton to oppose Defendants' stay motion. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Defendant: Frank P Muzio, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Michael R Tilden, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Jennifer C Warry, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Randy A Britton [email protected] Sent On: 10/17/2025 10:48:46 Notice of Docket Entry sent to the parties by email.
  84. Determination Regarding Indigency, issued. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D.
  85. Randy Britton's Motion for an Extension of time (to October 31, 2025), filed.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more