Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Appeal Court

Court

Nevada Appeal Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-12
Status Case Closed
Type Civil Appeal Family Law Proper Person
Docket 15 entries
Disposition dismiss

Docket Entries

  1. Case Closed (COA).
  2. Filed Order Affirming in Part and Dismissing in Part. We dismiss Brian's untimely challenges to the decree of divorce. We conclude Brian fails to demonstrate the district court abused its discretion by adopting Rourong's proposed order. Accordingly, we conclude that Brian is not entitled to relief. COA-MG/BB/DW (COA)
  3. Filed Proper Person (Brian Yu) Motion to Extend Time for Petition for Rehearing or Review. (COA)
  4. Issued Notice to Provide Proof of Service. Due date: 7 days. (COA)
  5. Filed Order. Appellant has filed a pro se letter stating that he wishes to file a response to this court's April 29, 2024, Order Affirming in Part and Dismissing in Part by filing a motion for reconsideration. Appellant asks what the filing code for this action is. This court does not utilize filing codes. If appellant wishes to file a petition for rehearing in this matter, see NRAP 40, he shall have 14 days from the date of this order to do so. If no petition for rehearing or review is filed within that time, the clerk shall issue the remittitur. (COA)
  6. Filed Proper Person Motion for Reconsideration (COA)
  7. Filed Proper Person- Respondent Opposes to Appellant' Proposal for Reconsideration (COA)
  8. Filed Proper Person Petition for Rehearing(SC)
  9. Filed Proper Person Affidavit and Service of Brian Yu. (COA).
  10. Filed Notice to Pay Filing Fee. Appellant shall remit this filing fee to the Supreme Court Clerk's office within 14 days of the date of this order. The failure to pay the requisite filing fee within the time ordered may result in the court declining to consider the petition for rehearing. (COA).
  11. Filing Fee Paid. $150.00 Check # 924 from Brian K. Yu (COA)
  12. Returned Unfiled Document(Answer Brief and Appellant's Motion for Reconsideration (05-24-2024)(SC)
  13. Filed Order. On May 24, 2024, appellant filed a pro se motion for reconsideration and on June 3, 2024, appellant filed a pro se petition for rehearing. This court will take no action on the May 24, 2024, motion for reconsideration (docketed on June 4, 2024) or respondent's opposition to that motion. No answer to appellant's petition for rehearing shall be filed unless ordered by this court. (COA)
  14. Filed Order Denying Rehearing. "Rehearing Denied." NRAP 40(c). COA-MG/BB/DW. (COA)
  15. Transferred to Supreme Court (COA).

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more