Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-26
Status OPEN
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 22 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Tillery, Michael
Defendant Uber Technologies Inc | Glasscock, Megan
Photo of Hon. KETCHEL, TERRANCE R

Judge

Hon. KETCHEL, TERRANCE R

Okaloosa County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF MEGAN GLASSCOCKS INTERROGATORIES TO PLF
  2. MEGAN GLASSCOCKS REQUEST TO PRODUCE DIRECTED TO PLF
  3. AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
  4. ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE(S) OF MEGAN GLASSCOCK
  5. EMAIL SENT- RECIPIENTS: MANCINI, ANGELO ESTEFFANO SUBJECT: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT – 2024 CA 002843 F, TILLERY, MICHAEL VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC ATTACHMENT COUNT: 1 EMAILDOCKETDESCRIPTIONS: NINSTC-10/28/2024
  6. NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REVIEW
  7. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION WITH MEMORANDUM OF LAW (UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC)
  8. NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITHIN COURT FILING
  9. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL: OBO UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  10. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
  11. SUMMONS SERVED: MEGAN GLASSCOCK 10/15/2024
  12. NOTICE OF FINAL SERVICE AND PROPOSED CASE DESIGNATION (PLF)
  13. SUMMONS SERVED: UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 9/27/24
  14. PAYMENT $420.00 RECEIPT #2024036255
  15. EMAIL SENT- RECIPIENTS: LINEBERRY, GREGORY WAYNE SUBJECT: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT – 2024 CA 002843 F, TILLERY, MICHAEL VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC ATTACHMENT COUNT: 3 EMAILDOCKETDESCRIPTIONS: SIT-9/26/2024,OPR-9/26/2024
  16. ORDER TO PLAINTIFF RE REQUIRED REPORTING
  17. SUMMONS SERVICE FEE CIRCUIT CIVIL ASSESSED $20.00
  18. SUMMONS ISSUED TO: MEGAN GLASSCOCK
  19. SUMMONS ISSUED TO: UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  20. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
  21. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  22. JUDGE KETCHEL, TERRANCE R: ASSIGNED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.