Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-28
Status Pending
Type 15 Cv Other Employment Civil Unlimited
Docket 20 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Rodriguez, Anthony
Defendant Clinica Sierra Vista., A Nonprofit Corporation|Guevara, Ester Marin
Photo of Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Judge

Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 10/16/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: T-2
  2. Served 07/08/202412:10 PM Served 07/23/2024
  3. Comment as to Clinica Sierra Vista, a Nonprofit corporation, by personal service
  4. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Amount of service attempts are not sufficient.
  5. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Stipulation and Proposed Order Permitting filing of First Amended Complaint. Reason: File a stand alone Proposed First Amended Complaint. The clerk's office may not detach exhibit A from the stipulation for filing. Order page does not contain enough information regarding the case. Need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (Short title and case number)
  6. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Comment STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER to Permit Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint
  7. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment First amended complaint was filed 08/02/2024
  8. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Missing Mandatory Judicial Council Form POS-010. Please attach the Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt behind the POS-010 as one filing. Please review.
  9. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment 3b relationship to party served is missing. 4 is incomplete.
  10. Comment as to Ester Marin Guevara, by electronic service
  11. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment First Amended Complaint filed 12/11/2023. First Amended Complaint supersedes complaint filed 8/2/24. Caption under the case number does not reflect the First Amended Complaint complaint.
  12. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Please ensure the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information conforms to the first paragraph of the answer.True name is to be consistent throughout.
  13. Comment Proof of Service for First Amended Complaint
  14. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  15. View Document Ruling 10/28/2024 Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Ruling Comment Resetting case management conference
  16. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Reset from 12/30/2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase