Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-19
Type Ap Other
Docket 8 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lawrence, Edward
Defendant State Of Missouri|Bailey, Andrew

Docket Entries

  1. Court Order Issued ORDER ISSUED: RULE 84.17 DOES NOT APPLY TO AN ORDER OVERRULING A MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE. ACCORDINGLY, APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC IS STRICKEN. Associated Entries: 02/22/2022 - Other Motion +
  2. Other Motion APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RHEARING OR REHEARING EN BANC. Filed By: EDWARD LAWRENCE Associated Entries: 02/28/2022 - Court Order Issued +
  3. Not Participating Not Participating - Mary Rhodes Russell
  4. Disp - Motion Overruled/Denied APPELLANT'S MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE OVERRULED. RUSSELL, J., NOT PARTICIPATING. ORDER LETTER ATTACHED TO THIS SENT TO ATTORNEY GENERAL VIA E-MAIL AND E-FILING SYSTEM. ORDER LETTER SENT TO APPELLANT VIA REGULAR MAIL ON THIS DATE.
  5. Court Order Issued ORDER ISSUED: APPELLANT'S DOCUMENT ENTITLED, "SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM" ORDERED FILED AS IS.
  6. Filing PETITIONER'S DOCUMENT ENTITLED, "SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM" FILED "AS IS." Filed By: EDWARD LAWRENCE
  7. Other Motion APPELLANT'S MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE FILED WITH SERVICE. Filed By: EDWARD LAWRENCE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.