Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Case Information
Filed
2022-09-12
Status
Closed
Type
Proprietary Information Or Trade Secrets
Docket
35 entries
Parties
Plaintiff
Rms Media Group, Inc.
Defendant
Mc Intosh, Christopher
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Case assigned to: DCM Track A - Average was added on 09/12/2022
- Original civil complaint filed.
- Civil action cover sheet filed.
- Demand for jury trial entered.
- RMS Media Group, Inc.'s MOTION for appointment of Special Process Server.
- Corporate Disclosure Statement filed
- Plaintiff RMS Media Group, Inc.'s EMERGENCY Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction
- Todd A Newman, Esq.'s Memorandum in support of Ex parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction
- Plaintiff RMS Media Group, Inc.'s Motion for Short Order of Notice
- Affidavit of Mirand Lamani
- Endorsement on Motion for Short Order of Notice (#5.0): Summons and Order of Notice to issue returnable 9/22/2022 at 2:00 pm IN Lawrence "D" Session
- Endorsement on Motion for Special Process Server (#3.0): ALLOWED
- The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 09/12/2022 15:30:16
- Summons and order of notice issued on a Motion for Short Order of Notice, returnable on 09/22/2022 02:00 PM Hearing on Preliminary Injunction.
- Answer with a Counterclaim and claim for trial by jury Received from Defendant Christopher McIntosh
- Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Christopher McIntosh
- Affidavit of Todd A. Newman regarding proof of service
- Endorsement on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (#4.0): ALLOWED After hearing, the motion is Allowed with respect to "Requested Relief" (a)(b)(c) and Denied with respect to (d)(e)(f). The Defendant shall fill an affidavit reflecting this position as stated in his response to plaintiffs motion for P.I. Preliminary Injunction to issue upon payment of $90. Judge: Barrett, Hon. C. William
- Preliminary Injunction issued for Plaintiff RMS Media Group, Inc.. It is ordered and adjudged that Defendant(s) Christopher McIntosh and their various attorneys and agents are: (a) From breaching or attempting to breach the confidentiality obligation in his employment agreement with RMS; (b) From using, disclosing, or communicating to any third person any of RMS¿s confidential client, business, marketing, or pricing information, including without limitation any of the information contained in the Client List and other customer date that Mr. McIntosh sent to his personal email account and placed on a flash drive immediately prior the termination of his employment with RMS; (c) To immediately return to RMS all confidential client, business, marking, and pricing information that Mr. McIntosh removed from RMS, including without limitation all information contained in the Client List and other customer date that Mr. McIntosh sent to his personal email account and placed on a flash drive immediately prior the termination of his employment with RMS;
- Event Result:: Hearing on Preliminary Injunction scheduled on: 09/22/2022 02:00 PM Has been: Held as Scheduled Comments: FTR 3 - 2:24:49 Hon. C. William Barrett, Presiding Staff: Debra Vernava, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
- Supplemental Affidavit of Christopher McIntosh Pursuant to Order of the Court
- Plaintiff's Notice of intent to file motion to dismiss count 3 of the counterclaim Applies To: RMS Media Group, Inc. (Plaintiff)
- Plaintiff RMS Media Group, Inc.'s Motion to strike Settlement Offer from Pleadings
- RMS Media Group, Inc.'s Memorandum in support of
- Opposition to Motion to Strike filed by Christopher McIntosh
- Reply/Sur-reply Applies To: RMS Media Group, Inc. (Plaintiff)
- Rule 9A notice of filing
- Plaintiff RMS Media Group, Inc.'s Motion to dismiss certain counts Count III of Counterclaim
- RMS Media Group, Inc.'s Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss
- Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Christopher McIntosh
- Reply/Sur-reply Applies To: RMS Media Group, Inc. (Plaintiff)
- Rule 9A notice of filing
- Endorsement on Motion to strike (#12.0): DENIED After thorough consideration. The plaintiff's citation to Mass. G. Evid. 408 is misplaced. That rule addresses the admissibility of settlement information at trial, something the Court express no opinion on.
- Endorsement on Motion to dismiss all counts (#13.0): DENIED After thorough consideration. The Defendant is correct that, although he may not recover for both breach of contract and quantum merit, he may plead both in the alternative. Moreover, Counterclaim 3 plausibly suggests an entitlement to relief.
- Received from Plaintiff RMS Media Group, Inc.: Answer to the Counterclaim
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In
