Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-10
Status Closed
Type Civil Superior Ct (3 Pa)|Other Superior Court Complaint
Docket 26 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Matanuska Susitna Borough
Defendant Marmon, Billie Jean
Photo of Hon. Stohler Kristen C

Judge

Hon. Stohler Kristen C

North Slope Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Order Granting Motion Matanuska-Susitna Borough Case Motion #4 Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Default Judgment (Part 1)
  2. Superior Court Complaint Receipt: 2193377 Date: 06/10/2024
  3. Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
  4. Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (PPK only) Attorney: Dooling, Erin Elizabeth (2401003) Filing Party: Matanuska-Susitna Borough Case Motion #1
  5. Attorney Information Attorney Dooling, Erin Elizabeth representing Plaintiff Matanuska-Susitna Borough as of 06/13/2024
  6. Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Notice of Rule 4(f) Proof of Service Erin Elizabeth Dooling (Attorney) on behalf of Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Plaintiff)
  7. Return of Service - Summons Served On: 6.17.2024 Billie Jean Marmon (Defendant);
  8. Order Granting Motion For Preliminary Injunction Matanuska-Susitna Borough Case Motion #1 7777-8366 (PPK only)
  9. Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Request for Status Hearing Attorney: Ashmore, Erin Elizabeth (2401003) Filing Party: Matanuska-Susitna Borough Case Motion #2
  10. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Request for Status Hearing CURED TO: ERIN ELIZABETH ASHMORE ACTION NEEDED TO CORRECT FILING You have recently submitted documents related to the above case. These documents are either incomplete or do not follow correct procedures. Please do the following: You did not file a proposed order with your request, motion, or opposition. File a proposed order, provide the other side in the case with a copy, and file a certificate of service showing when and how you gave a copy to the other side. You can use Certificate of Service (form TF-700), available at ak-courts.info/tf700. Civil Rule 77. Civil Deficiency Memo (11/23) Sent on: 05/06/2025 15:35:49.51
  11. Proposed Order Granting Matanuska-Susitna's Request for Status Hearing Erin Elizabeth Ashmore (Attorney) on behalf of Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Plaintiff) Case Motion #2: Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Request for Status Hearing
  12. Order Granting Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Request for Status Hearing Case Motion #2 Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Request for Status Hearing
  13. Application for Default Against: Billie Jean Marmon (Defendant);
  14. Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Application for Entry of Default Against Billie Jean Marmon Attorney: Ashmore, Erin Elizabeth (2401003) Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Matanuska-Susitna Borough Case Motion #3
  15. Entry of Default Granted Against: Billie Jean Marmon (Defendant);
  16. Order Granting Motion - Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Application for Entry of Default Against Billie Jean Marmon Case Motion #3 Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Application for Entry of Default Against Billie Jean Marmon
  17. Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Default Judgment (Part 1) Attorney: Ashmore, Erin Elizabeth (2401003) Filing Party: Matanuska-Susitna Borough Case Motion #4
  18. Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Default Judgment (Part 2) Erin Elizabeth Ashmore (Attorney) on behalf of Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Plaintiff) Case Motion #4: Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Default Judgment (Part 1)
  19. Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Default Judgment (Part 3) Erin Elizabeth Ashmore (Attorney) on behalf of Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Plaintiff) Case Motion #4: Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Default Judgment (Part 1)
  20. Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Default Judgment (Part 4) Case Motion #4: Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Default Judgment (Part 1)
  21. Cost Bill Attorney: Ashmore, Erin Elizabeth (2401003) Filing Party: Matanuska-Susitna Borough Case Motion #5
  22. PROOF OF SERVICE
  23. Judgment: Final Judgment, Permanent Injunction, and Award of Damages
  24. Order Granting Motion Matanuska-Susitna Borough Case Motion #5 Cost Bill
  25. Judgment Entered Judgment Amount: 341,850.00 Pre-Judgment Interest: 35,332.30 Attorney Fees: 3,705.00 Court Costs: 315.00 Other Fees: 0.00 Judgment Total: 381,202.30 Terms: Post Judgment Interest 7.5% Type: Judgment Judge: Stohler, Kristen C Judgment Date: 11/04/2025 Judgment Time: 12:00PM Referee: Stohler, Kristen C Recommendation Date: 11/04/2025 Judgment Status: Judgment Entered Judgment For: Matanuska-Susitna Borough - Plaintiff Judgment Against: Marmon, Billie Jean - Defendant ------------------------------------------- Issuance ------------------------------------------- Writ Type: Date Issued: Accrued Interest: Satisfied Amount: ------------------------------------------- Return ------------------------------------------- Processed By: Received From: Accrued Costs: Satisfied Amount: Date Returned: Date Collected: Date Paid: Judgment Satisfied Amount: 0.00 Judgment Balance: 381,202.30 Case Total: 0.00 Case Satisfied Amount: 0.00 Case Balance: 0.00
  26. Judgment on the Pleadings for Plaintiff

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more