Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-30
Type Dissolution
Docket 73 entries
Disposition dismissed
Photo of Hon. Farris Laura S

Judge

Hon. Farris Laura S

Creek County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL INTERPRETER TRANSLATOR
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. SUMMONS
  14. UCCJEA AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 43 O.S. § 551-209
  15. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  16. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  17. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  18. PROOF OF SERVICE-CANDACE RISINGSUN-BRADEN
  19. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
  20. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE
  21. RESPONDENTS APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE EMERGENCY CUSTODY AND APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ASSISTANCE OR HABEAS CORPUS
  22. EMERGENCY CUSTODY ORDER
  23. PER BAILIFF NEXT DATE SET 11/4/24 AT 9:30AM (BD)
  24. CM:JS:NO CSR:11/4/2024- PETITIONER IS PRESENT WITH COUNSEL CHARLES GRAHAM-RESPONDENT IS PRESENT WITH COUNSEL COURTNEY DRISKELL-THE PARTIES ANNOUNCE THE FOLLOWING AGREEMENT- 1. THE PARTIES SHALL EXERCISE JOINT CUSTODY-PHYSICAL CUSTODY SHALL BE WEEK ON, WEEK OFF-DURING PETITIONERS VISITITATION, BAILEY MORAN SHALL NOT BE PRESENT. EXCHANGES SHALL TAKE PLACE AT 6 PM SUNDAY NIGHT-PETITIONER IS NOT TO ALLOW ANY CONTACT BETWEEN MINOR CHILD AND MRS MORAN-2. PARTIES ARE TO EXCHANGE INCOME VERIFICATION WITHIN 10 DAYS-CHILD SUPPORT PER THE GUIDELINES-3. BOTH PARTIES SHALL TAKE THE HIGH CONFLICT PARENTING COURSE-4. EXCHANGES SHALL OCCUR AT THE QUIK TRIP LOCATED AT CREEK TURNPIKE AND RIVERSIDE DRIVE
  25. PER BAILIFFS CALENDAR NEXT DATE SET 12/3/24 AT 9:30AM (BD)
  26. DIEPC: PARTY COMPLETED DIVORCE IMPACT EDUCATIONAL PROG.-CLABE P RISING SUN-BRADEN
  27. CM:LF:NO CSR-12/3/2024-CHARLES PRESENT WITH PETITIONER-RESPONDENT PRESENT WITHOUT COURTNEY-CONTINUED TO 1/14/2025 AT 9:30 AM
  28. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO THE PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR DIVORCE AND DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE AND COUNTER PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
  29. APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW
  30. ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAW
  31. CM:LF:NO CSR:1/14/2025-CHARLES PRESENT WITH PETITIONER-RESPONDENT PRESENT PRO SE-PARTIES ORDERED TO MEDIATION-SET 2/25/25 AT 9:30
  32. MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF PARENTAL VISITATION RIGHTS
  33. PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM
  34. APPLICATION FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT CITATION
  35. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  36. CITATION FOR CONTEMPT
  37. ORDER FOR HEARING FOR ENFORECEMENT OF VISITATION RIGHTS
  38. CM:LF:NO CSR:2/25/2025-REVIEW-PO-25-9, PO-25-10, PO-25-12-PETITIONER PRESENT WITH JUSTIN RINCK-PO-25-9 DISMISSED -COSTS WAIVED-ATTORNEY FEES RESERVED-PO-25-10 DISMISSED COSTS WAIVED-PO-25-12 DISMISSED COSTS WAIVED-FD-24-178-GAL APPOINTED- TRAVIS BARNETT- ORDER TO BE SUBMITTED-ORDER FROM 11/4/2024 RESTRICTING MRS MORAN FROM BEING AROUND THE MINOR CHILD IS REMOVED-MRS MORAN NOT TO BE LEFT ALONE WITH THE MINOR CHILD AND NOT TO DISCIPLINE THE MINOR CHILD
  39. CM:LF:NO CSR 2/25/25 JUSTIN PRESENT WITH PETITIONER-RESPONDENT NOT PRESENT-MR.RINCK REQUESTS GAL BE APPOINTED-REQUEST TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT UNTIL 11:00AM
  40. APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  41. REQUEST TO SET CASE FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
  42. ORDER SETTING HEARING/STATUS CONFERENCE
  43. ORDER SETTING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
  44. ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM
  45. MOTION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL CONFERNCE
  46. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE-COURTNEY CAGEL OF CAMPBELL LAW FIRM-FOR RESPONDENT
  47. ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
  48. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE-TRAVIS BARNETT AS GAL
  49. APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY ORDERS
  50. SHOW CAUSE ORDER
  51. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING-JUSTIN RINCK-COURTNEY CAGLE
  52. CM:LF:NO CSR:7/10/25-SHOW CAUSE-JUSTIN RINKE PRESENT WITH PETITIONER-COURTNEY PRESENT WITH RESPONDENT-EMERGENCY CUSTODY REQUEST IS WITHDRAWN-COURT ORDERS THAT NO PERSON IS TO SMOKE IN THE HOME OR CAR WITH THIS CHILD-ANY MEDICAL MARIJUANA IS TO BE IN A LOCKED BOX-PARTIES ARE TO RETURN TO VISITATION SCHEDULE SET OUT IN TEMPORARY ORDER
  53. PETITION FOR WRIT OF ASSISTANCE/WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS
  54. WRIT OF ASSISTANCE/WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS
  55. CM:LF:NO CSR: 7-22-25 - HEARING ON RESPONDENT'S PETITION/WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS - JUSTIN RINCK PRESENT WITH PETITIONER, COURTNEY L CAGLE PRESENT WITH RESPONDENT - ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL IN ATTENDANCE. MINOR CHILD PRESENT. GAL TRAVIS BARNETT NOT IN ATTENDANCE BUT AVAILABLE TELEPHONICALLY. GAL RECOMMENDS MINOR CHILD STAY WITH PETITIONER UNTIL HIS INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED. THE COURT SUSTAINS. THE MINOR CHILD SHALL UNDERGO INDIVIDUAL COUNSELING DURING THE TIME THAT RESPONDENT'S VISITATION IS SUSPENDED. MUTUAL RESTRAINING ORDER ENTERED. ALL PARTIES AND ASSIGNS TO REMAIN AWAY FROM THE OTHER'S HOME/RESIDENCE AND PLACE OF EMPLOYEMENT. PETITIONER REQUIRED TO PROVIDE HIS RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS TO RESPONDENT AND SHALL NOT SECRET THE MINOR CHILD.
  56. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO DETERMINE SCHOOL FOR MINOR CHILD
  57. SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
  58. CM:LF:NO CSR:8/7/25-NO PARTIES PAPEAR-PETITIONER'S MOTION TO DETERMINE SCHOOL IS WITHDRAWN-AN AGREED ORDER WAS SUBMITTED
  59. AGREED ORDER FOR SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
  60. MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE
  61. ORDER SETTING HEARING/STATUS CONFERENCE
  62. APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW
  63. ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAWAL
  64. PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR COURT ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SUBMIT TO DRUG SCREEN
  65. REQUEST TO RE-SET CASE FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
  66. ORDER SETTING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
  67. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  68. PRE TRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER
  69. CM:LF:NO CSR:12/09/25-JUSTIN RINCK PRESENT WITH PETITIONER-RESPONDENT PRESENT PRO SE-PETITIONER REQUESTS A DRUG TEST-NO OBJECTION FROM THE RESPONDENT-DRUG TEST IS ORDERED AT PETITIONER'S EXPENSE-SUBJECT TO REALLOCATION-RESPONDENT IS TO TAKE THE TEST BY THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS TODAY-DISCOVERY AND WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS TO BE COMPLETED BY JANUARY 30, 2026-TRIAL TO BE SET AFTER MEDIATION-ORDER FOR VISITATION TO BE DRAFTED BY MR RINCK
  70. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE-CHRISTOPHER LYONS FOR RESPONDENT
  71. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO DEEM DRUG TEST POSITIVE
  72. ORDER SETTING HEARING

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more