Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Shawnee Court

Court

Shawnee Court

Kansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-06-27
Status Post Judgment
Type Lm Seller Plaintiff (debt Collection)
Docket 54 entries

Parties

Plaintiff City Of Oakley
Defendant Dean, Malinda Faith
Photo of Hon. Temaat, Mark J

Judge

Hon. Temaat, Mark J

Logan County (KS)

Kansas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Document Service Summons: Issued on 6/27/2022; to Malinda Dean on 6/27/2022; Assigned to Sheriff; Service Fee of $0.00
  3. Issued Summons: Issued on 06/27/2022; to Malinda Dean on 06/27/2022; Assigned to Sheriff. Service fee of $0.00.
  5. Attorney of Record Plaintiff: City of Oakley Attorney of Record Kendall McVay
  7. PLE: Petition Petition PLE: Petition
  9. PLE: Summons Summons PLE: Summons
  11. Hearing Scheduled Hearing Scheduled (Answer Hearing 08/10/2022 02:00 PM)
  13. RET: Return of Service - Summons Summons returned PS LGSO 7/15/2022
  15. ORD: Order Originated by Judge Order Chapter 61
  17. AFF: Affidavit (Generic) Military Affidavit
  19. ORD: Judgment Judgment
  21. MOT: Garnishment Request for Non-Wage Garnishment Party: Plaintiff City of Oakley Request for Non-Wage Garnishment
  23. ORD: Garnishment Order of Non-Wage Garnishment
  25. RET: Return of Service Return of Service on Non-Wage Garnishment
  27. MOT: Motion (Generic) Motion to Pay
  29. ORD: Payout Order To Pay
  31. MOT: Garnishment Request for Non-Wage Garnishment Party: Plaintiff City of Oakley Request for Non-Wage Garnishment
  33. ORD: Garnishment Order of Non-Wage Garnishment
  35. RET: Return of Service Return of Service on Non-Wage Garnishment
  37. MOT: Garnishment Request for Wage Garnishment Party: Plaintiff City of Oakley Request for Wage Garnishment
  38. ORD: Garnishment Order of Wage Garnishment
  39. RET: Return of Service Return of Service on Wage Garnishment
  40. MOT: Garnishment - Computation Request Request for Written Computation of Earnings Withheld
  41. INF: Garnishment - Release Garnishment Release
  42. MOT: Garnishment Request for Non-Wage Garnishment Party: Plaintiff City of Oakley Request for Non-Wage Garnishment
  43. ORD: Garnishment Order of Non-Wage Garnishment
  44. RET: Return of Service Return of Service on Non-Wage Garnishment
  45. MOT: Motion (Generic) Motion to Pay
  46. ORD: Payout Order To Pay
  47. MOT: Garnishment Request for Non-Wage Garnishment Party: Plaintiff City of Oakley Request for Non-Wage Garnishment
  48. ORD: Garnishment Order of Non-Wage Garnishment
  49. RET: Return of Service Return of Service on Non-Wage Garnishment
  50. MOT: Garnishment Request for Non-Wage Garnishment Party: Plaintiff City of Oakley Request for Non-Wage Garnishment
  51. ORD: Garnishment Order of Non-Wage Garnishment
  52. RET: Return of Service Return of Service on Non-Wage Garnishment
  53. MOT: Garnishment Request for Non-Wage Garnishment Party: Plaintiff City of Oakley Request for Non-Wage Garnishment
  54. ORD: Garnishment Order of Non-Wage Garnishment

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more