Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Summons does not conform exact to Complaint. Please review Party information (including DOES information).
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 11/19/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: H
- Unserved Served 08/30/202410:50 AM Served 08/28/20241:51 PM
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Attorney bar number is missing. Please revise and resubmit.
- Comment as to Vivint Inc., a corporation in Utah via personal service
- Comment as to Freedom Forever LLC, a limited liability company in Delaware via personal service
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment TO: Brandon P. Rainey, Esq. RE: Joint Stipulation and [proposed] Order for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint; Proposed Order (cover sheet) - envelope #16952555, 10/14/24 REASON: -1) defendant party names as listed throughout both documents do not conform to defendant names as listed on the operative Complaint; -2) The Proposed Order (cover sheet) is missing an attached copy of the [proposed] Order; -3) The approriate filing as to each party making their first appearance via the Stipulation and [proposed] Order should be included in the e-filing submission. Only one first appearance fee as to Vivint Inc., A Corporation in Utah, was included. The first appearance fee for Freedom Forever LLC, a Limited Liability Company in Delaware should be included when the e-filing is resubmitted.
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment TO: Elijah J. Yun, Esq. RE: Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint; Proposed Order (cover sheet)- envelope #17034913, 10/21/2024 REASON: -1) Names of the defendants making first appearance in the case via this Stipulation do not conform exact to the Complaint. If parties are erroneously sued this should be stated; -2) When submitting a Proposed Order (cover sheet) with an attached copy of the [proposed] Order, the e-filing envelope must also include a separate, stand-alone PDF copy of the [proposed] Order. The separate, stand-alone PDF copy must comply with CRC Rule 2.111 as to format of first page. This e-filing envelope did NOT include the separate, stand-alone PDF copy of the [proposed] Order.
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Cross defendants name listed does not conform to the first paragraph. Party name is to be consistent. Review/correct and re-submit
- Comment re: Answer and Cross-Complaint
- Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 10/30/2024
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In