Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Travis County

Court

Travis County

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-07
Status Closed
Type Partnership
Docket 74 entries
Disposition default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Jamal Lal, Beena Lal Babu
Defendant Raja, Joseph Cross
Photo of Hon. 455 Th, District Court

Judge

Hon. 455 Th, District Court

Travis County

Texas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. MOTION DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION IN LIMINE Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  3. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED CITATION - RASHITA RAJA
  5. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED CITATION - JOSEPH CROSS RAJA
  7. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANTS ORIGINAL ANSWER Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  9. PLEADING PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED PETITION Party: Plaintiff THANKIAH VINCENT, MARSH DEEPAK
  11. RESPONSE DEFENDANTS FIRST AMENDED ANSWER Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  13. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO NON-PARTY MATHEWS CPA, INC. Party: Plaintiff THANKIAH VINCENT, MARSH DEEPAK
  15. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED RETURN SERVICE OF SUBPOENA - PADMINI MATHEVAN
  17. MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  19. MOTION DEFENDANTS FIRST AMENDED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  21. MOTION PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS Party: Plaintiff THANKIAH VINCENT, MARSH DEEPAK
  23. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING Party: Plaintiff THANKIAH VINCENT, MARSH DEEPAK
  25. ORDER (Judicial Officer: CONNOR, MADELEINE) ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS
  27. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  29. MOTION MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  31. ORDER (Judicial Officer: EISERLOH, LAURIE) AGREED ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
  33. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF TRIAL SETTING Party: Plaintiff THANKIAH VINCENT, MARSH DEEPAK
  35. EXHIBITS RECEIPT 5411DC
  37. PLEADING PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED PETITION Party: Plaintiff JAMAL LAL, BEENA LAL BABU; Plaintiff MICHAEL, ARUL; Plaintiff THANKIAH VINCENT, MARSH DEEPAK
  39. OTHER/NOTICE DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  41. OTHER/NOTICE DEFENDANT S FIRST REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF
  43. OTHER/NOTICE DEFENDANT S FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO PLAINTIFF
  45. MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  47. MOTION DEFENDANTS FIRST AMENDED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  49. RESPONSE PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS FIRST AMENDED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL Party: Plaintiff JAMAL LAL, BEENA LAL BABU; Plaintiff MICHAEL, ARUL; Plaintiff THANKIAH VINCENT, MARSH DEEPAK
  51. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING
  52. MOTION PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR NO-ANSWER DEFAULT JUDGMENT Party: Plaintiff MICHAEL, ARUL
  53. COURT CORRESPONDENCE JURY TRIAL NOTIFICATION NOVEMBER 18, 2024
  54. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE GRANTED (OCA) (Judicial Officer: SOIFER, JAN) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL
  55. MOTION MOTION TO ENTER AGREED DOCKET CONTROL ORDER Party: Plaintiff JAMAL LAL, BEENA LAL BABU; Plaintiff MICHAEL, ARUL; Plaintiff THANKIAH VINCENT, MARSH DEEPAK
  56. OTHER/NOTICE PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO MEDIATION
  57. OTHER/NOTICE LETTER REGARDING NON SETTLEMENT
  58. ORDER (Judicial Officer: EISERLOH, LAURIE) AGREED DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
  59. MOTION NAMAN, HOWELL, SMITH & LEE, PLLC s MOTION TO WITHDRAW Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  60. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF REMOTE HEARING
  61. OTHER/NOTICE AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOTE HEARING
  62. MOTION PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Party: Plaintiff JAMAL LAL, BEENA LAL BABU; Plaintiff MICHAEL, ARUL; Plaintiff THANKIAH VINCENT, MARSH DEEPAK
  63. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  64. RESPONSE DEFENDANTS' SECOND AMENDED ANSWER Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  65. RESPONSE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  66. MOTION DEFENDANTS' TRADITIONAL AND NO EVIDENCE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS
  67. JUDGMENT NOTICE MAILED
  68. FINAL OR PARTIAL DISPOSITION ORDER (Judicial Officer: THOMAS, SHERINE) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  69. OTHER/NOTICE DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF HEARING
  70. COURT CORRESPONDENCE NOTICE OF JURY TRIAL JUNE 23, 2025
  71. OTHER/NOTICE PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF FILING BUSINESS RECORDS AFFIDAVIT
  72. RESPONSE PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Party: Plaintiff MICHAEL, ARUL; Plaintiff THANKIAH VINCENT, MARSH DEEPAK
  73. MOTION DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMNE
  74. MOTION DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' INADEQUATELY DISCLOSED WITNESSES AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS' CHARACTER EVIDENCE Party: Defendant RAJA, RASHITHA; Defendant RAJA, JOSEPH CROSS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more