Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- $0.00
- Issue Date: 10/24/2024 Service: SUMMONS ISSUED Method: (B) CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $ PARAMORE, ANDRELITA 147 OVERHILL RD BOARDMAN, OH 44512 Tracking No: 9414726699042225743323
- SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : (B) CERTIFIED MAIL Issued : 10/24/2024 Service : SUMMONS ISSUED Served : 10/30/2024 Return : 10/31/2024 On : PARAMORE, ANDRELITA Signed By : A PARAMORE Reason : (B) SUCCESSFUL Comment : Tracking # : 9414726699042225743323
- ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT. MKD
- HEARING SCHEDULED Event: CIVIL PRE TRIAL (B) Date: 03/10/2025 Time: 9:45 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 2
- COUNSEL PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: JOSEPH M JAMMAL ESQ DEFENDANT PRESENT SETTLEMENT OFFERS MADE OR PENDING; SEE CONSENT JUDGMENT ENTRY SIGNED THIS DATE. /S/ DONALD J DESANTO
- AGREED JUDGMENT ENTRY SIGNED BY THE PARTIES: UPON AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN FAVOR FOR THE PLAINTIFF, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AND AGAINST DEFENDANT, ANDRELITA PARAMORE AKA ANDRELITA HAKEEM, IN THE SUM OF $3,412.00, LESS PAYMENT(S)/CREDIT(S) OF $0.00. NO INTEREST SHALL ACCRUE ON THIS JUDGMENT. THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED TO SETTLE THE ABOVE MATTER FOR $3,537. PLAINTIFF AGREES NOT TO EXECUTE ON SAID JUDGMENT, OTHER THAN THE FILING OF A JUDGMENT LIEN, SO LONG AS SAID DEFENDANT(S) PAY THE SUM OF $50 ON OR BEFORE 04/10/2025 FOLLOWED BY PAYMENTS OF $50 OR MORE PER MONTH TO BE MADE BY THE 10TH OF EVERY MONTH UNTIL THE AMOUNT IS PAID IN FULL. ALL PAYMENTS MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO STENGER & STENGER, P.C., AND RECEIVED AT THE OFFICE OF STENGER & STENGER, P.C., 2618 EAST PARIS AVENUE SE, GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546 BY THE DUE DATE(S) HEREIN. PAYMENTS MAY BE MADE BY PHONE AT (888)906-9743 OR ONLINE AT WWW.PAYSTENGER.COM. DEFENDANT AGREES TO FULLY AND FOREVER RELEASE, ACQUIT, AND DISCHARGE PLAINTIFF, ITS HEIRS, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, ATTORNEYS, EMPLOYEES, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, PARTNERS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY OR CAUSES OF ACTION THAT THE DEFENDANT MAY HAVE NOW OR IN THE FUTURE, FOR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF ANY FEDERAL OR STATE STATUTES, LAW OR COMMON LAW, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THIS ACTION. IF THE DEFENDANT FAILS TO SUBMIT ANY PAYMENT ON TIME OR FOR THE FULL AMOUNT, PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO COMMENCE EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FULL JUDGMENT AMOUNT WHICH IS THEN DUE AND OWING, WITHOUT FURTHER ORDER OF THIS COURT. ACCEPTANCE OF A LATE PAYMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF PLAINTIFF'S RIGHT TO INSTITUTE EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS. THERE IS NO JUST REASON FOR DELAY. IT IS SO ORDERED. /S/JOSEPH M HOUSER
- CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT REQUESTED Attorney: HUSPASKA ESQ, ANTHONY (87618) Receipt: 339911 Date: 07/07/2025
- CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT ISSUED CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT Sent on: 07/07/2025 08:41:11.74
- MOTION TO STAY OR VACATE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT LIEN FILED BY DEFENDANT.
- MATTER CONSIDERED ON THE MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT FILED 07/08/25 TO STAY OR VACATE ISSUANCE OF A JUDGMENT LIEN. THE PARTIES AGREED JUDGMENT ENTRY OF 03/11/25 PERMITTED THE PLAINTIFF TO FILE A JUDGMENT LIEN REGARDLESS OF THE PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN THE PARTIES. MOTION OVERRULED./S/JMH/DJD
- OBJECTIONS TO COURT RULING FILED BY DEFENDANT.
- JUDGMENT ENTRY: DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO COURT RULING IS TREATED AS A MOTION TO RECONSIDER. DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED. /S/JMH
- $125.00
- $0.00
- $0.00
- $0.00
- $15.00
- $0.00
- $0.00
- $0.00
- $0.00
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In