Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-11-04
Type Ap Employment Security
Docket 12 entries

Docket Entries

  1. ase Disposed- Other Mandate issued.
  2. ismissed Case disposed - Brief preserves nothing for appellate review
  3. ppellant's Brief Filed By: TINA FERGUSON
  4. n Courts Own Motion Time for filing appellant's opening brief extended to February 3, 2025.
  5. ourt Order Issued Now on this day, the Court notes that on December 19, 2024, it received appellant's two duplicate e-mails each with seventeen attached documents. The Court observes that appellant's brief is due January 3, 2025. The Court determines that the e-mails and attachments are not in the proper form to be filed as a brief as the required elements of a brief are not set out as required by Supreme Court Rule 84.04, there is no appendix, and there is no indication of service of the documents on respondent Heritage Tractor, Inc., a party shown as not represented by an attorney. See Supreme Court Rules 84.026 and 84.04. The Court, on its own motion, extends the time for appellant to file the opening brief to February 3, 2025. No further extensions of time to file said brief will be granted except for good cause arising out of extraordinary circumstances. Press of other business is not considered to be an extraordinary circumstance.
  6. ourt Order Issued ROA filed by the Commission on November 4, 2024. Notice given regarding filing of appellant's brief.
  7. ecord on Appeal Complete
  8. ecord on Appeal ROA; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  9. cknowledgement Letter Sent
  10. ivision Assigned
  11. OA Filed in Appellate Court
  12. o Filing Fee Due

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.