Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Stamford County

Court

Stamford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-11-05
Type M 00 Misc Injunction
Docket 62 entries
Disposition withdrawal of action

Parties

Plaintiff Graham Capital Management, L.p.
Defendant William Latimer|Aqr Capital Management, Llc

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION
  2. APPEARANCE Appearance
  3. APPEARANCE
  4. APPEARANCE
  5. APPEARANCE Appearance
  6. SUMMONS
  7. COMPLAINT
  8. ORDER FOR HEARING, NOTICE AND SERVICE/RULE TO SHOW CAUSE (PRE-SERVICE)
  9. PROPOSED ORDER - TEMPORARY/EX PARTE
  10. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF BOND
  11. APPLICATION For Temporary Injunction and Order to Show Cause
  12. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION RESULT: Order 11/7/2024 BY THE CLERK
  13. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/7/2024 BY THE CLERK
  14. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/7/2024 BY THE CLERK
  15. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
  16. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION #102.00 Motion for Temporary Injunction
  17. RETURN OF SERVICE
  18. RETURN OF SERVICE Orders and Order to Show Cause
  19. AMENDED WRIT AND SUMMONS
  20. AMENDED COMPLAINT VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT
  21. AMENDED COMPLAINT Redline Comparing Verified Amended Complaint and Verified Complaint
  22. APPLICATION APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER RESULT: Order 11/21/2024 BY THE CLERK
  23. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/21/2024 BY THE CLERK
  24. MOTION FOR ORDER MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  25. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION PLAINTIFF?S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  26. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE PB 2-16 APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR ATTORNEY JESSE MILLER TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE IN A COURT CASE
  27. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/25/2024 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  28. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE PB 2-16 APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR ATTORNEY JAMES YU TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE IN A COURT CASE
  29. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/25/2024 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  30. AFFIDAVIT Corrected Affidavit of Jesse Miller in Support of Motion to Appear to PHV
  31. AFFIDAVIT Corrected Affidavit of James Yu in Support of Motion to Appear to PHV
  32. RETURN OF SERVICE
  33. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  34. NOTICE Notice of Defendants' Conference Statement
  35. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION PLAINTIFF?S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  36. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 12/16/2024 HON ROBERT GENUARIO
  37. ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/16/2024 HON ROBERT GENUARIO
  38. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  39. AMENDED ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE by defendant William Latimer
  40. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 Latimer's Objections
  41. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 AQR's Objections
  42. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 PLAINTIFF?S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT WILLIAM LATIMER?S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  43. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 PLAINTIFF?S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT WILLIAM LATIMER?S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
  44. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 PLAINTIFF?S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT AQR?S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  45. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 PLAINTIFF?S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT AQR?S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
  46. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant William Latimer?s Special Defenses #122.00
  47. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant AQR?s Special Defenses #121
  48. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PB 13-5 Joint Motion for Protective Order RESULT: Granted 1/31/2025 HON JOHN KAVANEWSKY
  49. ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/31/2025 HON JOHN KAVANEWSKY
  50. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Motion for Continuance for the Submission of Stipulated Uncontested Facts RESULT: Granted 1/17/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  51. ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/17/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  52. MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION Pre-Hearing Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions/Applications for TRO or Injunc.
  53. MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENT
  54. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION PLAINTIFF?S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
  55. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION
  56. MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION Latimer's Pre-Hearing Brief in Opposition to Motions and Applications for Injunctive Relief
  57. REQUEST Plaintiff's Request for Temporary Restraining Order or Immediate Hearing on Temporary Injunction
  58. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) #138 Plaintiff's Request for Temporary Restraining Order or Immediate Hearing
  59. WITHDRAWAL Caseflow Request (Dkt. No. 139.00)
  60. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Caseflow Request - Mark off of hearing scheduled for March 4-6, 2025 RESULT: Order 2/24/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  61. ORDER RESULT: Order 2/24/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  62. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION Plaintiff's Action is Withdrawn As To All Defendants Without Costs To Any Party

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more