Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-16
Status Pending
Type 19 Cv Intellectual Property Civil Unlimited
Docket 36 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ac Irrigation Holdco, Llc
Defendant Ag & Industrial Enterprises, Inc., A California Corporation|Navarro, Armando|Cross ac Irrigation Holdco, Llc|Cross ac Irrigation Holdco, Llc|Cross lutje, Curtis
Photo of Hon. Pulskamp Gregory

Judge

Hon. Pulskamp Gregory

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Summons does not conform exact to Complaint. Please review Party information. Please review/correct and re-file into existing case.
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 11/22/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: J
  3. Served 08/15/202411:00 AM Unserved
  4. Comment as to AG & Industrial Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation, by substituted service
  5. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Caption does not conform exact to complaint. Review party names including "does" verbiage. Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint. Missing Proof of Service.
  6. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 10/10/2024
  7. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Caption does not conform exact to complaint. Review "does" verbiage. Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint. Please ensure the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information conforms to the body of the answer and caption under the case number. Party names are to be listed as they appear in the case and remain consistent. Cross complaint - Party name listed in the caption does not conform to the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information, body and title under the case number. True name is to be consistent throughout. Please ensure all cross actions are listed per CRC 2.111(4) as a cross complaint was filed 10/10/24.
  8. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - All Cross-Actions are to be listed, please review CRC 2.111(4). Please ensure the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information conforms to the body of the answer and caption under the case number. Party names are to be listed as they appear in the case. If parties are erroneously sued this should be stated. Cross Complaint - All Cross-Actions are to be listed, please review CRC 2.111(4). Party name listed in the caption does not conform to the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information, body and title under the case number. True name is to be consistent throughout.
  9. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Caption does not conform to the Complaint. Review "inclusive" verbiage on the DOES information. Cross Complaint - All cross actions are to be listed. Missing cross action filed 10/10/24.
  10. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment When initiating a Cross-Complaint, all previous cross actions are to be listed. *No corrections needed on Answer and Proof of Service. Please review/correct and resubmit all documents. Thank you.
  11. Comment on Answer to Complaint and Cross-Complaint
  12. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 10/16/2024
  13. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  14. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  21. Comment Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declarations of Curtis Lutje and Jeffrey W. Noe
  22. Comment Evidence in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction - Public Redacted Version Pursuant to CRC Rule 2.551
  23. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  24. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Filed 1/17/25 Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declarations of Curtis Lutje and Jeffrey W. Noe

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more