Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Middlesex County

Court

Middlesex County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-30
Type P 90 Property All Other
Docket 56 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lionel Santos|Lucille Santos Family Trust Dtd 6/12/08 Lionel Santos, Steven T. Santos & Lionel M. Santos Co Trustees
Defendant Christopher F. Wanat

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. AFFIDAVIT OF PORTIA BAUDISCH, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DKT. NO. 137.00
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. AFFIDAVIT Affidavit Regarding Verified Complaint
  6. LIS PENDENS
  7. REQUEST TO REVISE
  8. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME To Object to Request to Revise RESULT: Granted 1/28/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  9. ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/28/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  10. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Overruled 2/24/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  11. ORDER RESULT: Overruled 2/24/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  12. SCHEDULING ORDER AGREED UPON/JOINT RESULT: Accepted 2/11/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  13. ORDER RESULT: Accepted 2/11/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  14. REPLY MEMORANDUM DEFENDANT'S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO REVISE (DKT. #103)
  15. MOTION FOR NONSUIT FOR FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 4/21/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  16. ORDER RESULT: Denied 4/21/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  17. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE WRITTEN DISCOVERY REQUESTS
  18. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER DATES RESULT: Granted 4/14/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  19. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/14/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  20. REVISED COMPLAINT
  21. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR NONSUIT RESULT: Sustained 4/21/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  22. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 4/21/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  23. REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR NONSUIT
  24. REPLY Sur-reply to Reply Memorandum #113.00
  25. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO EXCHANGE WRITTEN DISCOVERY RESULT: Granted 5/19/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  26. ORDER RESULT: Granted 5/19/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  27. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, ON CONSENT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' REVISED COMPLAINT RESULT: Granted 6/2/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  28. ORDER RESULT: Granted 6/2/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  29. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Motion for Extension of Time, On Consent to Respond to Plaintiffs' Revised Complaint RESULT: Granted 7/28/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  30. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/28/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  31. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Withdrawn 6/6/2025 BY THE DEFENDANT Last Updated: Result Information - 06/09/2025
  32. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION Withdrawal of Motion #118 Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order
  33. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 6/6/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  34. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/6/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  35. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22 AND FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
  36. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE AND COUNTERCLAIM TO PLAINTIFFS' REVISED VERIFIED COMPLAINT, DATED APRIL 18, 2025
  37. REQUEST TO REVISE Request to Revise Special Defenses and Counterclaim
  38. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME For Time to Respond to Interrogatories, Requests for Production, and Requests for Admissions RESULT: Order 10/20/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  39. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/20/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  40. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  41. REPLY RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO REVISE
  42. AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM DEF'S REVISED ANSWER AND SPEC. DEFENSES TO PLA.'S REVISED VERIFIED COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIM
  43. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PB 13-5
  44. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admissions
  45. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (Dkt. No. 128.00) RESULT: Sustained 12/15/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  46. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 12/15/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  47. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM RESULT: Denied 12/19/2025 BY THE CLERK
  48. ORDER RESULT: Denied 12/19/2025 BY THE CLERK
  49. ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM
  50. NOTICE NOTICE OF INTENT TO RELY ON PLAINTIFFS? ADMISSIONS
  51. MOTION FOR NONSUIT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ORDER Motion for Non-Suit for Failure to Respond to Discovery Requests
  52. REPLY to Objection to Motion for Protective Order #130.00
  53. REPLY DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF (Dkt. # 135)
  54. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  55. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DKT. NO. 137.00
  56. AFFIDAVIT OF CHRISTOPHER WANAT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DKT. NO. 137.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more