Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Ingham County

Court

Ingham County

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-28
Status CLOSED
Docket 41 entries
Disposition dismissed

Parties

Defendant Russelle Sanford Brisboy
Photo of Hon. Wanda Stokes

Judge

Hon. Wanda Stokes

Ingham County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. BOND INFORMATION: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, P
  2. PETITION / ORDER DISCHARGE PROBATION - SUCCESSFUL
  3. PROBATION VIOLATION HEARING, DEF IN CUSTODY, ON THE RECORD, DEF SENT TO 167 DAY JAIL, CREDIT FOR 167, DEFENDANT DISCHARGED FROM PROBATION SUCCESSFULLY/ORAL MOTION GRANTED/WRAP PROGRAM VIOLATION DISMISSED (DUE TO ENDING OF GOVERNMENT PROGRAM) ALL OTHER0001
  4. COMMITMENT TO INGHAM COUNTY JAIL - PV
  5. PROBATION VIOLATION / SENTENCE EVENT: C30 - PROBATION VIOLATION SENTENCE DATE: 10/21/2025 TIME: 11:00 AM JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: COURTROOM 7 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT: HEARING HELD ON THE RECORD
  6. PETITION / ORDER AMENDING PROBATION PART 1 & 2
  7. BENCH WARRANT RETURNED/LODGED
  8. HEARING IN OPEN COURT - APA: N MACOMBER, DEF ATTY: JARED AUSTIN, DEF IN CUSTODY -VIA POLYCOM, PROB AGENT PRESENT, DEF PG TO 5PVS, COURT ACCEPTS, HEARING WAIVED, SENT - DEF SENTENCED TO 69 DAYS CREDIT FOR 69 DAYS DEF REMANDED TO JAIL PENDING TRANSFER T0001
  9. HEARING HELD ON THE RECORD THE FOLLOWING EVENT: PROBATION VIOLATION BENCH WARRANT ARRAIGNMENT SCHEDULED FOR 05/21/2025 AT 8:45 AM HAS BEEN RESULTED AS FOLLOWS: RESULT: HEARING HELD ON THE RECORD JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: COURTROOM 7 -0001
  10. HEARING SET: EVENT: PROBATION VIOLATION BENCH WARRANT ARRAIGNMENT DATE: 05/21/2025 TIME: 8:45 AM JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: COURTROOM 7 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT: HEARING HELD ON THE RECORD
  11. NOTICE BY U.S. POSTAL SERVICE OF RETURN TO SENDER
  12. MOTION, AFFIDAVIT, AND BENCH WARRANT-PROBATION VIOLATION
  13. 2025 JUDICIAL CASELOAD REASSIGNMENT NOTICE
  14. COM ABSTRACT SENT COURT CONVICTION (ABSTRACT) HAS BEEN SENT FOR THE FOLOWING CHARGES: 3 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE USE METHAMPHETAMINE BMV: 9200
  15. CERTIFICATION OF REMOVAL OF ENTRY FROM LEIN
  16. ORDER OF PROBATION
  17. COMMITMENT TO INGHAM COUNTY JAIL AS TO COUNT 3
  18. CASE CLOSED C30
  19. AMENDED INFORMATION
  20. CRIME VICTIM'S RIGHTS ASSESSMENT - MISDEMEANOR
  21. REMOVAL OF ENTRY FROM LEIN
  22. HEARING HELD ON THE RECORD THE FOLLOWING EVENT: SENTENCING SCHEDULED FOR 01/27/2025 AT 3:45 PM HAS BEEN RESULTED AS FOLLOWS: RESULT: HEARING HELD ON THE RECORD JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: COURTROOM 7 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT STAFF: 0001
  23. C30 - SENTENCE INFORMATION HELD ON THE RECORD THE DEF IS SENTENCED AS TO COUNT 3 TO ICJ FOR 62 DAYS WITH CREDIT FOR 62 DAYS- PROBATION- 12 MON- STATE MIN: 50.00- CV: 75.00 OSF: 360.00- DEF SHALL CONTINUE SCRAM TETHER
  24. MISDEMEANOR MINIMUM COSTS - CIRCUIT
  25. 2025 JUDICIAL CASELOAD REASSIGNMENT NOTICE THE JUDGE WAS CHANGED FROM DRAGANCHUK, JOYCE A TO STOKES, WANDA .
  26. ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT FROM JUDGE JOYCE A. DRAGANCHUK TO JUDGE WANDA M. STOKES
  27. SCHEDULED IN ERROR THE FOLLOWING EVENT: JURY TRIAL CRIMINAL SCHEDULED FOR 01/06/2025 AT 8:30 AM HAS BEEN RESULTED AS FOLLOWS: RESULT: SCHEDULED IN ERROR JUDGE: DRAGANCHUK, JOYCE A LOCATION: COURTROOM 8 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT STAFF: 0001
  28. HEARING SET: EVENT: SENTENCING DATE: 01/27/2025 TIME: 3:45 PM JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: COURTROOM 7 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT: HEARING HELD ON THE RECORD
  29. HEARING SET: EVENT: JURY TRIAL CRIMINAL DATE: 01/06/2025 TIME: 8:30 AM JUDGE: DRAGANCHUK, JOYCE A LOCATION: COURTROOM 8 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT: SCHEDULED IN ERROR
  30. PLEA INFORMATION-C30 PL G TO ADDED COUNT 3; PEOPLE MOVE TO DISMISS COUNT 1 AND HAB 2 AT SENTENCING; COURT ACCEPTS; ADVICE OF RIGHTS; AMENDED INFO NEEDED; REFERRED TO PROBATION; ORAL MOTION REGARDING BOND MODIFICATION GRANTED; BOND MODIFIED TO $10,000.0001
  31. ORDER AMENDING BOND
  32. CIRCUIT COURT ADVICE OF RIGHTS FORM
  33. NOLLE PROSEQUI
  34. PLED GUILTY
  35. DISMISSED CHARGE
  36. PLEAD ON THE RECORD THE FOLLOWING EVENT: CRIMINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 12/02/2024 AT 2:00 PM HAS BEEN RESULTED AS FOLLOWS: RESULT: PLEAD/PLEA TAKEN JUDGE: DRAGANCHUK, JOYCE A LOCATION: COURTROOM 8 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT STAF0001
  37. ORDER SETTING CRIMINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
  38. HEARING SET: EVENT: CRIMINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: 12/02/2024 TIME: 2:00 PM JUDGE: DRAGANCHUK, JOYCE A LOCATION: COURTROOM 8 - VETERANS MEMORIAL RESULT: PLEAD/PLEA TAKEN
  39. HEARING SET: EVENT: ARRAIGNMENT DATE: 11/06/2024 TIME: 8:30 AM JUDGE: DRAGANCHUK, JOYCE A LOCATION: COURTROOM 8 - VETERANS MEMORIAL
  40. ARREST BOND ARREST BOND ADDED TO CASE WITH: ACTION CODE: CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - POSSESSION OF METHAMPHETAMINE/ECSTASY ARREST DATE: 10/02/2024 BOND STATUS: C30 BOND NOT POSTED STATUS DATE: 10/28/2024 BLANKET BOND: NO OKAY TO APPLY: NO 0001
  41. DISTRICT COURT BINDOVER RECEIVED; COMPLIANCE WITH FINGERPRINT REQUIREMENT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more