Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fairfield County

Court

Fairfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-29
Type M 50 Misc Declaratory Judgment
Docket 22 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Parinaya Pradhan
Defendant Suhrid Jyoti

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ANSWER AND/OR OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS PB 13-23(a) PLAINTIFF?S NOTICE OF FILING RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT?S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  2. SUMMONS
  3. COMPLAINT
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. SUPPLEMENTAL RETURN
  6. SUPPLEMENTAL RETURN
  7. MOTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 RESULT: Granted 2/11/2025 BY THE CLERK
  8. ORDER GR: D-01 RESULT: Granted 2/11/2025 BY THE CLERK
  9. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  10. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
  11. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 4/22/2025 BY THE CLERK
  12. ORDER RESULT: Denied 4/22/2025 BY THE CLERK
  13. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  14. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  15. MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 RESULT: Off 9/26/2025 HON CHARLES REED
  16. ORDER RESULT: Off 9/26/2025 HON CHARLES REED
  17. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-31
  18. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Granted 5/27/2025 HON THOMAS WELCH
  19. ORDER RESULT: Granted 5/27/2025 HON THOMAS WELCH
  20. OBJECTION TO MOTION PLAINTIFF?S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT?S MOTION TO DISMISS
  21. AFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT OF PHILIP C. PIRES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
  22. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more