Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Middlesex County

Court

Middlesex County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-29
Type C 00 Contracts Construction All Other
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Haynes Construction Company
Defendant Glen Salamone|David Rusconi

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION RESULT: BY THE PLAINTIFF
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. MOTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 against Glenn Salamone RESULT: Denied 11/26/2024 BY THE CLERK
  6. ORDER RESULT: Denied 11/26/2024 BY THE CLERK
  7. MOTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 against David Rusconi RESULT: Denied 11/26/2024 BY THE CLERK
  8. ORDER RESULT: Denied 11/26/2024 BY THE CLERK
  9. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 12/30/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  10. ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/30/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  11. MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 First and Third Counts of the Complaint
  12. MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss First and Third Counts of the Complaint
  13. MOTION FOR ORDER that Discovery not be had pending resolution of Motion to Dismiss RESULT: Order 1/28/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  14. ORDER RESULT: Order 1/28/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  15. OBJECTION TO MOTION Pltf's Obj. to Defs' Motion for Order that Discovery not be had pending resol. of motion dismiss
  16. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SCHEDULING ORDER by Haynes Construction Company RESULT: Granted 2/24/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  17. ORDER RESULT: Granted 2/24/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  18. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to Respond to [#104.00] Motion to Dismiss by Haynes Construction Company RESULT: Granted 2/24/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  19. ORDER RESULT: Granted 2/24/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  20. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to Respond to Motion to Dismiss RESULT: Granted 4/11/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  21. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/11/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  22. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/11/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  23. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/11/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  24. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 6/30/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  25. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/30/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  26. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to Respond to Motion to Dismiss RESULT: Order 6/30/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  27. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/30/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  28. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more