Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-30
Status Closed
Type Eqa Equitable Action Involving Any Right, Title Or Interest In Land, G.l. Chapter 185, 1 (k)
Docket 14 entries

Parties

Plaintiff 71 Woodsley Road Llc
Defendant Bolduc, Roberta|Bolduc, Robert

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Stipulation of Dismissal - Mass.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(ii)
  2. Case assigned to the Average Track per Land Court Standing Order 1:04.
  3. Land Court miscellaneous filing fee Receipt: 429730 Date: 03/30/2022
  4. Land Court surcharge Receipt: 429730 Date: 03/30/2022
  5. Land Court summons Receipt: 429730 Date: 03/30/2022
  6. Uniform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
  7. The case has been assigned to the A Track. Notice sent. Notice of Judge and Track Assignment was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Anthony A McGuinness, Esq. [email protected] null: File Copy Sent On: 04/06/2022 12:55:42
  8. Event Scheduled Judge: Rubin, Hon. Diane R. Event: Case Management Conference Date: 05/19/2022 Time: 11:30 AM Counsel notified via email.
  9. Summons returned to Court with service on Roberta Bolduc, Robert Bolduc filed. Served at the last and usual place of abode and by mailing first class mail on April 6, 2022.
  10. Defendants' Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims, filed.
  11. Joint Case Management Conference Statement, filed.
  12. Order Referring Case to Dispute Resolution Screening Session, issued. (Copies emailed to Attorneys Anthony McGuinness, Marwan Zubi, and Paul Nicolai) Judge: Rubin, Hon. Diane R.
  13. Event Resulted: Case Management Conference scheduled on: 05/19/2022 11:30 AM Has been: Case management conference and early intervention event held via videoconference. Attorney Anthony McGuinness appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff and Attorney Marwan Zubi appeared on behalf of the Defendants. Court is in receipt of the Joint Case Management Conference Statement, and the Sketch Plan filed as Exhibit A thereto. Court inquired as to prospects for settlement or mediation, particularly in light of the nature of this case as a boundary line dispute. Counsel jointly advised that settlement discussions have been ongoing and Attorney McGuinness advised that it would be beneficial to engage in mediation concurrent with discovery, while Attorney Zubi indicated that he is open to mediation but would need to confer with his clients. Following colloquy, court to issue a mediation screening order. By July 19, 2022, parties to complete mediation screening. By July 26, 2022, parties to submit written joint report to the court as to outcome of the mediation screening, whether parties are willing to attend mediation, and if so, naming mediation provider, identity of neutral, and date of session. Using screenshare, the court then discussed with counsel the Exhibit A Sketch Plan, which was prepared by Plaintiff, and court inquired as to whether Defendants intend to obtain an independent survey. By June 21, 2022, Defendants to file a status report advising as to whether they are content with Plaintiff's survey or intend to engage a surveyor to prepare an independent survey plan. With respect to discovery, by July 7, 2023, all discovery to be complete, to include expert designations and disclosures. Hon. Diane R. Rubin, Presiding Counsel notified via email.
  14. Plaintiff 71 Woodsley Road, LLC's Answer to Counterclaim, filed.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more