Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-28
Status Pending
Type Cm Criminal Misdemeanor
Docket 41 entries
Disposition not guilty

Parties

Plaintiff State Of Indiana
Defendant Ortiz Tovar, Arles
Photo of Hon. Galvin, Stephen R

Judge

Hon. Galvin, Stephen R

Lawrence County (IN)

Indiana

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case Opened as a New Filing
  2. Case Filed Electronically
  3. Appearance Filed
  4. Information Filed
  5. Probable Cause Found: Order Issued
  6. Initial Hearing
  7. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  8. No Contact Order Issued
  9. Service Returned Served: Order of Protection
  10. Advisement of Rights Conducted
  11. Order on Initial Hearing
  12. Notice Filed
  13. Order for Monitored Conditional Release
  14. Confidential Form Filed (PO, JQ and NCO Process Only)
  15. Indigent Counsel Appointed at Court Expense
  16. Interpreter Services Used
  17. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  18. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  19. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  20. Appearance Filed
  21. Request for Discovery Filed
  22. Jury Trial Demand Filed
  23. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  24. Motion for Continuance Filed
  25. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  26. Order Granting Motion for Continuance
  27. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  28. Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information
  29. Pretrial Services Report Filed
  30. Pretrial Conference
  31. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  32. Order for Pretrial Conference
  33. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  34. Motion for Continuance Filed
  35. Notice Issued to Parties
  36. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  37. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  38. Pretrial Conference
  39. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  40. Order for Pretrial Conference
  41. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.