Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-24
Type Grandparent Visitation
Docket 63 entries
Disposition dismiss
Photo of Hon. Fd Docket E

Judge

Hon. Fd Docket E

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FAMILY AND DOMESTIC INITIAL FILING.
  2. GRANDPARENT VISITATION
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. PETITION FOR GRANDPARENT RIGHTS
  5. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  6. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  7. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  9. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  10. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  11. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  14. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  15. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  16. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  17. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  18. SUMMONS FEE
  19. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  20. UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT AFFIDAVIT AND VERIFICATION
  21. REQUEST FOR PARENTING PLAN CONFERENCE SET 11-06-2024 9:30AM BEFORE JUDGE LORETTA RADFORD ROOM 605
  22. OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE FD DOCKET E TO THIS CASE.
  23. RECEIPT # 2024-4691347 ON 10/24/2024. PAYOR: LACOURSE LAW TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 272.14. LINE ITEMS: FD-2024-2111: $193.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2024-2111: $6.00 ON AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL. FD-2024-2111: $1.66 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-2111: $5.00 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. FD-2024-2111: $1.55 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-2111: $7.00 ON AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY. FD-2024-2111: $0.45 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. FD-2024-2111: $2.48 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-2111: $25.00 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-2111: $10.00 ON AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND. FD-2024-2111: $10.00 ON AC88 SHERIFF’S SERVICE FEE FOR COURT HOUSE SECURITY. FD-2024-2111: $10.00 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  24. RETURN OF SERVICE ON NO DATE GIVEN/DEF/BY PSS
  25. TULSA COUNTY PARENTING PLANNING CONFERENCE ATTESTATION FORM
  26. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND RESERVATION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND
  27. RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR GRANDPARENT VISITATION
  28. NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER OF INTEREST BY DHS
  29. JUDGE LORETTA RADFORD: (PARENTING PLAN CONFERENCE): PETITIONER PRESENT, REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON, PRESENT. RESPONDENT PRESENT, REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN, PRESENT. PARENTING PLAN CONFERENCE STRICKEN. THE RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR GRANDPARENT VISITATION TO BE SET BEFORE FD DOCKET E.
  30. APPLICATION FOR STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
  31. AMENDED UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT AFFIDAVIT AND VERIFICATION
  32. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): ORDER FOR HEARING ON RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR GRANDPARENT VISITATION SET 12-19-2024 AT 11:30 AM (IN PERSON, ROOM 348, 15 MINUTES) PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN. FILED IN JUDGE'S OUTBOX UNDER MISC “S” (MOLLY SULLIVAN). DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SET 12-19-2024 AT 11:30 AM (IN PERSON, ROOM 348, 15 MINUTES) PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN. FILED IN JUDGE'S OUTBOX UNDER LACOURSE LAW.
  33. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  34. RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S PETITION FOR GRANDPARENT RIGHTS
  35. PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR GRANDPARENT VISITATION
  36. ORDER FOR HEARING
  37. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF NOVEMBER 15, 2024 HEARING
  38. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE REVIEWED BY THE COURT AND IS GRANTED. ORDER FOR HEARING ENTERED AND SIGNED. ORDER FOR HEARING ON RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR GRANDPARENT VISITATION WITH PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SET 12-19-2024 IS STRICKEN AND RESET ON 1-16-2025 AT 11:15 AM (IN PERSON, ROOM 348, 15 MINUTES) PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN. FILED IN JUDGE'S OUTBOX UNDER MISC “S” (MOLLY SULLIVAN).
  39. ORDER FOR HEARING
  40. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER ENTERED AND SIGNED. PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN. FILED IN JUDGE'S OUTBOX UNDER LACOURSE LAW.
  41. INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER
  42. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): RESPONDENT'S OBJECTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR GRANDPARENT VISITATION, PETITIONER'S STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - SETTING PREVIOUSLY STRICKEN AND RESET ON 1-16-2025 AT 11:15 AM. (IN PERSON, ROOM 348, 15 MINUTES) PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN.
  43. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR GRANDPARENT VISITATION WITH PETITIONER'S STATUS/SCHEDULING - SETTING IS PASSED BY THE COURT TO 1-24-2025 AT 11:00 AM. (IN PERSON, ROOM 348, 15 MINUTES) PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN.
  44. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): (IN PERSON, ROOM 348, 15 MINUTES) PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON, BOTH PRESENT. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN, BOTH PRESENT. SETTING IS AUDIO RECORDED. RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR GRANDPARENT VISITATION - ARGUMENTS GIVEN TO THE COURT. RESPONDENT'S MOTION IS DENIED. SCHEDULING ORDER PREVIOUSLY ENTERED IS TO REMAIN IN PLACE. PETITIONER'S STATUS/SCHEDULING IS STRICKEN AS MOOT. ORDER TO BE SUBMITTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON.
  45. NOTICE OF RECORD - DIGITAL AUDIO FILE
  46. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): ORDER OVERRULING MOTION TO DISMISS ENTERED AND SIGNED. PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN. FILED IN JUDGE'S OUTBOX UNDER LACOURSE LAW.
  47. ORDER OVERRULING MOTION TO DISMISS
  48. APPLICATION FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
  49. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): PETITIONER'S PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET 5-1-2025 AT 10:30 AM (IN PERSON, ROOM 348, 15 MINUTES) ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ENTERED AND SIGNED. PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN. FILED IN JUDGE'S OUTBOX UNDER LACOURSE LAW.
  50. ORDER SETTING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
  51. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER
  52. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): (IN PERSON, ROOM 348, 15 MINUTES) PETITIONER'S PRETRIAL CONFERENCE HELD. TRIAL (ALL DAY, IN PERSON, ROOM 348) SET 6-23-2025 AT 9:00 AM. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER ENTERED AND SIGNED. PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON, PRESENT. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN, BOTH PRESENT.
  53. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA
  54. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA
  55. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA
  56. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA
  57. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA
  58. JUDGE JULIE C DOSS (FD DOCKET E): PETITIONER (PRESENT) REPRESENTED BY JOEL LACOURSE (PRESENT) AND TAYLOR EDWARDS (PRESENT) RESPONDENT (PRESENT) REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN (PRESENT) HEARING ON GRANDPARENT VISITATION BEFORE THE COURT, RECORDED ON COURT EQUIPMENT DUE TO UNAVAILABILITY OF COURT REPORTER. 2 WITNESSES SWORN AND OFFERED TESTIMONY. LUNCH BREAK WAS TAKEN. AFTER LUNCH BREAK ATTORNEYS REQUESTED TIME TO DISCUSS POSSIBLE SETTLEMENTS. ONE HOUR LATER ATTORNEY LACOURSE ANNOUNCED THAT HE HAD JUST FOUND OUT CHILDREN ARE NATIVE AMERICAN THROUGH HIS CLIENT'S SON'S LINEAGE AND ARGUES THAT ICWA APPLIES AND CASE SHOULD BE SUSPENDED. COURT DENIED REQUEST AS ICWA DOES NOT APPLY IN GRANDPARENT VISITATION CASES. MS. SULLIVAN REQUESTS NEW TRIAL DATE TO ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS. AT THIS POINT BEING 3:30PM AND SEEING THAT 2ND TRIAL DATE WILL BE NEEDED, THE COURT GRANTS REQUEST. MR. LACOURSE DOES NOT OBJECT. TRIAL RESET FOR FULL DAY 8-29-25 AT 9:00AM.
  59. MOTION TO DISMISS
  60. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): PETITIONER'S MOTION TO DISMISS REVIEWED BY THE COURT AND IS GRANTED. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS ENTERED AND SIGNED. TRIAL SET 8-29-2025 IS STRICKEN. PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN. FILED IN JUDGE'S OUTBOX UNDER LACOURSE LAW.
  61. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
  62. DOSS, JULIE C (FD DOCKET E): TRIAL PREVIOUSLY STRICKEN AS CASE DISMISSED. PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY JAMES WILLIAMSON. RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY MOLLY SULLIVAN.
  63. RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND PARALEGAL FEES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more