Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-06
Status Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Type Original Proceeding Civil Prohibition
Docket 27 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Filed Notice from US Supreme Court/Certiorari Denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. (SC)
  2. Filed Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (SC)
  3. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Prohibition - Index. (SC)
  4. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Prohibition. - Volume 1. (SC)
  5. Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. Answer due: 21 days. Petitioners shall have 14 days from service of the answer to file and serve any reply. (SC)
  6. Filed Real Parties in Interest (Vaughn Hartung and Hilary Schieve) Streamlined Extension of Time to File Answer to Writ Petition. (SC)
  7. Filed Disapprove Real Parties in Interest (Vaughn Hartung and Hilary Schieve) Streamlined Extension. Streamlined extension is disapproved. (SC)
  8. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Real parties in interest Vaughn Hartung and Hillary Schieve's answer to petition for writ due: October 29, 2024. (SC)
  9. Filed Real Parties in Interest (Vaughn Hartung and Hillary Schieve) Answer to Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (SC)
  10. Filed Real Parties in Interest (David McNeely and 5 Alpha Industries, LLC) Notice of Non Opposition to John Doe's Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (SC)
  11. Filed Order. Real parties in interest David McNeely and 5 Alpha Industries, LLC have filed a notice of non-opposition to petitioner's petition for a writ of prohibition. Accordingly, petitioner shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file and serve any reply to the answer filed by real parties in interest Hillary Schieve and Vaughn Hartung. (SC)
  12. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. petitioner's reply due: December 17, 2024. (SC)
  13. Filed Filed Petitioner's (John Doe) Reply to Real Parties in Interest's Answer to Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (SC)
  14. Filed Order Scheduling Oral Argument. This court has determined that oral argument would be of assistance in resolving the issues presented in this matter. Accordingly, oral argument is scheduled for April 8, 2025, at 2:30 p.m., in Las Vegas. The parties shall have 2 minutes of uninterrupted argument at the beginning of each side's presentation in addition to 15 minutes each of argument time. The argument shall be limited to a total of 34 minutes. (SC)
  15. Issued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. (SC)
  16. Oral argument held this day. Case submitted for decision before the En Banc Court. (SC)
  17. Filed Order Denying Petition for Writ of Prohibition. "ORDER the petition DENIED." En Banc. (SC)
  18. Filed Petitioner John Doe's Emergency Motion for Stay of Remittitur Under NRAP 41(d)(3)(Action needed on or Before May 5, 2025.)(SC)
  19. Filed Real Parties in Interest (Vaughn Hartung and Hillary Schieve) Opposition to Petitioner's (John Doe) Emergency Motion for Stay of Remittitur Under NRAP 41(D)(3). (SC)
  20. Filed Petitioner's Reply in Support of Emergency Motion for Stay of Remittitur Under NRAP 41(d)(3). (SC)
  21. Filed Notice of Appearance (Stephanie J. Glantz as counsel for Real Parties in Interest David McNeely and 5 Alpha Industries, LLC.) (Counsel Updated.) (SC)
  22. Filed Notice of Disassociation of Counsel (Ryan T. Gormley and Brittany M. Llewellyn withdraws as counsel for Real Parties in Interest David McNeely and 5 Alpha Industries, LLC.) (Counsel Updated.) (SC)
  23. Filed Petitioner's Notice of Filing Petition for Writ of Certiorari to United States Supreme Court. (SC)
  24. Filed Order Denying Motion. Petitioner has moved to stay issuance of the notice in lieu of remittitur pending the filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. The motion is denied, and remittitur shall issue forthwith. (SC)
  25. Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. (SC)
  26. Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. (SC).
  27. Filed Notice from US Supreme Court/Certiorari Filed. A petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on May, 19, 2025 and placed on the docket as Case No. 24-1194. (SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more