Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-11
Status Pending
Type 06 Cv Breach Of Contract/warranty Civil Unlimited
Docket 48 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Brodie, Kyle
Defendant Ford Motor Company|Bluesky Auto Group, Inc.
Photo of Hon. Pulskamp Gregory

Judge

Hon. Pulskamp Gregory

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Demand for Jury filed prematurely.
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 07/29/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: J
  3. Comment Plaintiff's Demand for Jury Trial
  4. Served 04/17/202412:30 PM Served 04/19/20246:07 PM
  5. Comment as to Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation via personal service
  6. Comment as to Bluesky Auto Group Inc., a California Stock Corporation dba Porterville Ford via sub service
  7. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- Defendants name does not conform to complaint. Party names are to be listed as they appear in the case. If parties are erroneously sued this should be stated.
  8. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  9. Comment Plaintiffs notice of motion and motion to compel further response to special interrogatories from defendant ford motor company, and request for sanctions; memorandum in support of motion
  10. Comment Declaration of Armando Lopez in support of motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories from defendant Ford Motor Company and request for sanctions
  11. Comment plaintiffs separate statement in support of motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories from Ford Motor Company
  12. Comment Plaintiff's notice of motion and motion to compel further responses to request for production from defendant ford motor company, and request for sanctions; memorandum in support of motion
  13. Comment Plaintiff's separate statement in support of motion to compel further responses to requests for production from ford motor company
  14. Comment Declaration of Armando Lopez in support of motion to compel further responses to requests for production of documents from defendant Ford Motor Company and request for sanctions
  15. Comment Defendant Ford Motor company's motion for declaration of Jacob Doss in support of defendant ford entry of protective order to govern production of confidential materials
  16. Comment Declaration of Zakaria H. Amin in support of defendant Ford Motor Company's motion for entry of protective order to govern production of confidential materials
  17. Comment Defendant Ford Motor Companys notice of motion and motion for entry of protective order to govern production of confidential materials; memorandum of points and authorities
  18. Comment Plaintiff s opposition to Defendant ford motor Company s motion for entry Of protective order
  19. Comment Declaration of Armando Lopez in support plaintiffs Opposition to defendant Ford Motor company s Motion for entry of Protective order
  20. Comment for Plaintiff, Kyle Brodie
  21. Comment for Defendants, Ford Motor Company & BlueSky Auto Group, Inc. dba Porterville Ford
  22. Comment Defendant Ford Motor Company s reply in support of Defendant Ford Motor Company s motion for entry of Protective order to govern Production of confidential Materials
  23. View Document Motion (Pre-Disposition) 10/07/2024 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 9/5/2024 Defendant Ford Motor Company Motion for Protective Order
  24. Comment Notice of Ruling Re: Defendant Ford Motor Company's Motion for Entry of Protective Order to Govern Production of Confidential Materials
  25. Comment Plaintiff s Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Deposition Attendance And Production Of Documents By Ford Motor Company And Request For Sanctions
  26. Comment Declaration Of Armando Lopez In Support Of Motion To Compel Further Responses To Special Requests For Production Of Documents From Defendant Ford Motor Compamy And Request For Sanctions
  27. Comment Plaintiff s Separate Statement Of Issues In Support Of Motion To Compel Deposition Attendance Of Defendant Ford Motor Company s Person(S) Most Qualified And Custodian(S) Of Records; And Request For Sanctions
  28. Comment Defendant Ford Motor Company s opposition to plaintiffs motion to compel further responses to request for production from defendant Ford Motor company, and request for sanctions
  29. Comment Defendant Ford Motor Company s response to plaintiffs separate statement in support of motion to compel further responses to requests for production from Ford Motor Company
  30. Comment Defendant Ford Motor Company s separate statement In response to motion to Compel further responses to Special interrogatories from Ford Motor Company
  31. Comment Defendant Ford Motor Company s opposition to plaintiffs motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories from defendant Ford Motor Company, and request for sanctions
  32. Comment Declaration of Hannah M. Biemann in support of Ford Motor Company s motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories from ford motor company
  33. Comment Declaration of Hannah M. Biemann in support of Opposition to motion to compel Further responses to request for production of documents
  34. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Case Management Conference 10/14/2024 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  35. Comment Plaintiff s Reply In Support Of Motion To Compel Further Response To Special Interrogatories From Defendant Ford Motor Company And Request For Sanctions
  36. Comment Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Compel Further Responses To Request For Production From Defendant Ford Motor Company, And Request For Sanctions
  37. Comment Proof of Service
  38. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment 8/20/2024 Plaintiff Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production fron Defendant Ford Motors company
  39. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment 8/19/2024 Plaintiff Motion to Compel Special Interrogatories
  40. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment 10/08/24 Plaintiff's Motion to compel Person deposition
  41. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 10:00 AM Comment FCMC: 11/14/2025 // JT: 11/17/2025 // T/E: 7 DAYS (D-J)
  42. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 02:30 PM Comment JT: 11/17/25 @ 9:30 AM DIV J; T/E: 7 DAYS
  43. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 09:30 AM Comment T/E: 7 DAYS; JURY FOR BOTH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more