Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-26
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 107 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Midfirst Bank
Defendant Craig A. Howard|Jane Doe Name Unknown, The Unknown Spouse Of Craig A. Howard (if Any)|The United States Of America, Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development|The United States Of America, Office Of The Department Of The Treasury|State Of Ohio, Department Of Taxation
Photo of Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Judge

Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54681395 RETURNED 09/21/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HOWARD/CRAIG/A. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  3. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54671132 RETURNED 10/4/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE DOE - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  4. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54671131 RETURNED 09/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HOWARD/CRAIG/A. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  5. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54656741 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/23/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN PROCESSED BY COC 10/02/2024.
  6. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 41(A)(2), THIS CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF'S COSTS. FINAL COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). NOTICE ISSUED
  7. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER RULE 41(A)(2) 10/01/2024 - GRANTED
  8. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54656740 RETURNED 9/28/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DOE/JANE/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  9. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54656739 RETURNED 9/28/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HOWARD/CRAIG/A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  10. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54656734 RETURNED 09/10/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HOWARD/CRAIG/A. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  11. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54656735 RETURNED 09/10/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DOE/JANE/ - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  12. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54681397 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/19/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN PROCESSED BY COC 09/25/2024.
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54656742 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/16/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY PROCESSED BY COC 09/25/2024.
  14. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54681395 RETURNED 9/21/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HOWARD/CRAIG/A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  15. ANSWER FILED BY D5 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION ATTORNEY CORY STEINMETZ 0092319 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
  16. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54671131 RETURNED 9/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HOWARD/CRAIG/A. - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  17. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54656738 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/13/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 09/18/2024.
  18. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54656737 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/09/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY PROCESSED BY COC 09/18/2024.
  19. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54656736 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/09/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN PROCESSED BY COC 09/18/2024.
  20. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54681399 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/04/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 09/11/2024.
  21. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54681398 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/03/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY PROCESSED BY COC 09/11/2024.
  22. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54671135 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/04/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 09/11/2024.
  23. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54671134 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/03/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY PROCESSED BY COC 09/11/2024.
  24. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54671133 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/03/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN PROCESSED BY COC 09/11/2024.
  25. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54656735 RETURNED 9/10/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DOE/JANE/ - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  26. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54656734 RETURNED 9/10/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HOWARD/CRAIG/A. - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  27. 54661594 ON 08/28/2024 THE WITHIN NAMED HOWARD/CRAIG/A. WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  28. 54661595 ON 08/28/2024 THE WITHIN NAMED JANE DOE WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  29. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54681396 RETURNED 9/7/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE DOE - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  30. MAGISTRATE DEAN K HEGYES ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  31. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  32. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  33. SUMS COMPLAINT(54681399) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION 150 EAST GAY STREET 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  34. SUMS COMPLAINT(54681398) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY C/O US ATTY FOR NORTHERN DIST OF OH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  35. SUMS COMPLAINT(54681397) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN C/O US ATTY FOR NORTHERN DIST OF OH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  36. SUMS COMPLAINT(54681396) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE 17400 MAPLEBORO AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137-0000
  37. SUMS COMPLAINT(54681395) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CRAIG A. HOWARD 17400 MAPLEBORO AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  38. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED CRAIG SERVICE RETURN
  39. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED UNKN CRAIG SERVICE RETURN
  40. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  41. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  42. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  43. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  44. WRIT FEE
  45. WRIT FEE
  46. WRIT FEE
  47. WRIT FEE
  48. WRIT FEE
  49. SUMS COMPLAINT(54671135) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION 150 EAST GAY STREET 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  50. SUMS COMPLAINT(54671134) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY C/O US ATTY FOR NORTHERN DIST OF OH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  51. SUMS COMPLAINT(54671133) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN C/O US ATTY FOR NORTHERN DIST OF OH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  52. SUMS COMPLAINT(54671132) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE 17400 MAPLEBORO AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137-0000
  53. SUMS COMPLAINT(54671131) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CRAIG A. HOWARD 17400 MAPLEBORO AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  54. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  55. WRIT FEE
  56. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  57. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  58. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  59. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  60. WRIT FEE
  61. WRIT FEE
  62. WRIT FEE
  63. WRIT FEE
  64. SUMS COMPLAINT(54656742) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY C/O THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NORTHWEST WASHINGTON, DC 20530-0000
  65. SUMS COMPLAINT(54656741) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN C/O THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NORTHWEST WASHINGTON, DC 20530-0000
  66. SUMS COMPLAINT(54656740) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE 16115 STOCKBRIDGE AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44128-0000
  67. SUMS COMPLAINT(54656739) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CRAIG A. HOWARD 16115 STOCKBRIDGE AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44128-0000
  68. SUMS COMPLAINT(54656738) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION 150 EAST GAY STREET 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  69. SUMS COMPLAINT(54656737) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY C/O US ATTY FOR NORTHERN DIST OF OH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  70. SUMS COMPLAINT(54656736) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN C/O US ATTY FOR NORTHERN DIST OF OH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  71. SUMS COMPLAINT(54656735) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE 17400 MAPLEBORO AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  72. SUMS COMPLAINT(54656734) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CRAIG A. HOWARD 17400 MAPLEBORO AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  73. SUMS COMPLAINT(54661595) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JANE DOE 17400 MAPLEBORO AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137-0000
  74. SUMS COMPLAINT(54661594) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: CRAIG A. HOWARD 17400 MAPLEBORO AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  75. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  76. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  77. WRIT FEE
  78. WRIT FEE
  79. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  80. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  81. WRIT FEE
  82. WRIT FEE
  83. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  84. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  85. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  86. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  87. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  88. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  89. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  90. WRIT FEE
  91. WRIT FEE
  92. WRIT FEE
  93. WRIT FEE
  94. WRIT FEE
  95. WRIT FEE
  96. WRIT FEE
  97. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE PRIVATE PROCESS SERVER
  98. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE CERTIFIED MAIL
  99. JUDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  100. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  101. LEGAL RESEARCH
  102. LEGAL NEWS
  103. LEGAL AID
  104. COMPUTER FEE
  105. CLERK'S FEE
  106. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  107. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more