Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-11
Type Cc Dissolution W/ Children
Docket 25 entries
Disposition uncontested

Parties

Plaintiff Hartmann, Angel Marie
Defendant Hartmann, Aaron Michael
Photo of Hon. Hackett James Andrew

Judge

Hon. Hackett James Andrew

Benton County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Certificate of Delivery Certified copy of Judgment printed for Petitioner to pick up per request. Respondent's copy mailed to address on file.
  3. Certificate of Dissolution Sent to Bureau of Vital Records
  4. Judgment on Dissolution Respondent to pay to Petitioner $800 per month in child support beginning on August 1, 2024
  5. Uncontested
  6. Sound Recording Log Sheet
  7. Uncont Dissolution Hrng Held Associated Entries: 07/19/2024 - Uncont Dissolution Hrng Sched Scheduled For: 07/24/2024; 9:00 AM; JAMES ANDREW HACKETT; Hickory
  8. Judge/Clerk - Note Petitioner appears in person. Respondent does not appear. Respondent has filed an answer. All parties in appearance announce ready for hearing. Hearing held on the record. Upon the evidence adduced the court finds: This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties in this action. More than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the filing of the petition herein. Petitioner has been a resident of the State of Missouri for more than ninety (90) days preceding the filing of the petition herein. The marriage of the parties is irretrievably broken. The minor and unemancipated children of the parties for which an order of custody is needed is are identified in the Parenting Plan admitted into evidence as Exhibit B and C (hereinafter referred to as the Parenting Plan). Neither Petitioner nor Respondent has participated in any other custody proceeding regarding custody of the minor and unemancipated children in this or any other state; neither Petitioner nor Respondent has any information concerning any custody proceeding regarding the minor and unemancipated children pending in any court of this or any other state; and, neither Petitioner nor Respondent knows of any person not a party to this action who has actual physical custody of, or claims to have custody or visitation rights with, the minor and unemancipated children. After considering all relevant factors including those set forth in §452.375 RSMo., custody, visitation and parenting time provisions in the Parenting Plan are in the best interest of the children. Respondent has failed to complete a Parent Education Program as required by local court rule. After considering all relevant factors including those set forth in §452.340 RSMo.: The support provisions contained in the Parenting Plan are reasonable. The presumed amount of child support of $800 per month as shown in Form 14 received into evidence as Exhibit C is correct. All other Form 14s are rejected. The written Separation Agreement received into evidence as Exhibit A (hereinafter the Separation Agreement) is not unconscionable and is approved by the court. All marital property and all marital debts have been identified and divided by the court. Petitioner has not requested maintenance. Petitioner has waived maintenance in court. Respondent has not requested maintenance. Neither party has requested an award of attorney fees. Each party should pay their own attorney fees. Therefore, it is ordered that: The marriage of the parties be dissolved. Custody, visitation and parenting time of the children is ordered in accordance with the provisions of the Parenting Plan. The parties and the children are ordered to comply with all provisions of the Parenting Plan. The Parenting Plan is ordered incorporated into and made a part of the Judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of Petitioner and against Respondent for child support in the amount of $800 per month beginning on August 1st, 2024, and a like amount each month thereafter until otherwise modified or terminated by order of the court. Child support is payable to the Family Support Payment Center, PO Box 109002, Jefferson City, MO 65110-9002. Petitioner and Respondent are ordered to comply with all provisions of the Separation Agreement. The Separation Agreement is ordered incorporated into and made a part of the Judgment. Neither party is ordered to pay the other maintenance. This order is not modifiable. Each party shall pay their own attorney fees. Costs are taxed against Petitioner. Judgment entered as per entry filed. JAH
  9. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  10. Uncont Dissolution Hrng Sched Associated Entries: 07/24/2024 - Uncont Dissolution Hrng Held Scheduled For: 07/24/2024; 9:00 AM; JAMES ANDREW HACKETT; Hickory
  11. Notice of Hearing Filed
  12. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  13. Order Family Law Interim Order Form 68-1, signed and executed this date. Copy issued to respondent and petitioner by regular mail this date. alb
  14. Receipt Filed received $170 cash
  15. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  16. Answer Filed RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE Filed By: AARON MICHAEL HARTMANN
  17. Separation Agreement Filed
  18. Income & Expense Stmnt Filed Filed By: ANGEL MARIE HARTMANN
  19. Proposed Judmt/Dec Dis Filed
  20. Proposed Parenting Plan Filed PART B
  21. Proposed Parenting Plan Filed PART A
  22. Redaction Certification Filed
  23. Certificate of Dissolution
  24. Confid Dom Rel Info File Sheet
  25. Petition Filed - Domestic Rel Filed By: ANGEL MARIE HARTMANN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more